Re: Organizing a PING / Auto WG call

Hi Christine and Sam,

While consent management is well outside of our current scope, to help
address privacy concerns around the W3C Auto WG VISS spec we've been
discussing some ideas to be able to accommodate consent handling and in
doing so hope to encourage the industry in that direction.

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-automotive/2023Jun/0000.html

We would appreciate a chance to discuss with PING at your convenience and
get your input.



On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 7:39 PM Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org> wrote:

> Thanks Ted.
>
> The call link is here:
> https://mit.zoom.us/j/823321737?pwd=cUs5QlVNVXJvZmFnanZjdmJEQWI4Zz09
>
> We don’t use IRC. We take minutes in CryptPad.
>
> Best,
> Christine
>
> > On Jan 3, 2023, at 9:35 AM, Ted Guild <edwardguild@geotab.com> wrote:
> >
> > [correct current address for Ulf]
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 12:34 PM Ted Guild <edwardguild@geotab.com>
> wrote:
> > [adding Ulf - lead editor of VISS and dropping Sam]
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 10:48 AM Ted Guild <edwardguild@geotab.com>
> wrote:
> > Thanks Christine for reaching out and letting me know. I can make the
> 19th at 17UTC and will inform others. If you can send along or point me to
> the call coordinates that would be appreciated so I can put them in my
> calendar.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 10:45 AM Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org>
> wrote:
> > Hi Ted,
> >
> > With Sam out, the change of the year and everyone still coming back, we
> would like to do the call with you 19 January UTC 17 if that works.
> >
> > Best,
> > Christine
> >
> > > On Dec 2, 2022, at 7:57 AM, Ted Guild <edwardguild@geotab.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Looking forward to talking on Tuesday. I can make 5 January as my
> recurring call's cadence is biweekly so we can try to get a few of us on
> that PING call.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 10:35 AM Samuel Weiler <weiler@w3.org> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 1 Dec 2022, Ted Guild wrote:
> > >
> > > > This coming Tuesday the plan is for Isaac to present an alternate
> > > > authentication/authorization model ...
> > >
> > > I would be happy to join for that discussion.  Does the WG have anyone
> > > who's following the GNAP work in the IETF?  That's a follow-on to
> > > OAUTH and might be a better option than rolling something new.
> > >
> > > > I would be happy to attend a PING call and try to bring a
> contingency from
> > > > the Auto WG. 15 December at noon however I have a prior commitment,
> > > > coincidentally with an automotive cybersecurity research group I was
> trying
> > > > to form before leaving MIT, still involved in and have secured NSF
> funding
> > > > for the next three years. What is the cadence of the PING calls?
> > >
> > > 1st and 3rd Thursdays at noon Eastern, which puts the following one at
> > > January 5th.
> > >
> > > -- Sam
> >
>
>