W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-automotive@w3.org > January 2020

Access Restriction Discussion

From: Ulf Bjorkengren <ulfbjorkengren@geotab.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 13:44:36 +0100
Message-ID: <CAHfMbK8jok7yEEpvg27cqNHHcajybFWjmO1qaSK-KrvQ26eocg@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-automotive <public-automotive@w3.org>
In the access restriction tagging discussion at the WG meeting yesterday a
number of use cases were mentioned, together with possible solutions, e. g.
app manifests, configurations, etc.
I think we should be careful with introducing more new concepts than
necessary, and instead first analyze whether it can be supported by the
concepts we already have introduced in Gen2.
So I would suggest that we list the use cases, and try to see if/how they
can be supported by the infrastructure and functionality already introduced
before we start a discussion of adding any new.

Related to this I have created
https://github.com/w3c/automotive/issues/322 about
access restriction tagging. Which is only needed if we want to be able to
set different access restrictions to different signals. Assumed by me, but
I cannot recall seeing a written use case requirement on it...

Ulf Bjorkengren
Senior Connectivity Strategist | Ph. D.
Mobile +45 53562142
Visit www.geotab.com

Join us at Connect 2020

San Diego

January 13 - 16, 2020

Register Now! <https://www.geotab.com/connect/>
Received on Wednesday, 8 January 2020 12:43:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:06:15 UTC