- From: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 17:50:01 -0400
- To: public-automotive <public-automotive@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <983df3b7ac9a38aa414767d673b5f3c48b8c6053.camel@w3.org>
We had a short call today and we discussed in brief WebOfThings Working Group's Binding Templates which might be interesting for us. As people may recall we were discouraged at our Lyon meeting by Yves Lafon (W3C TAG) from going protocol-less in spite of interest in running Gen2 against other underlying protocols other than Web Sockets and HTTP such as MQTT or even UNIX sockets. While mappings are suboptimal they are a plausible option and that is what was needed by the WoT people in trying to abstract out the mix of protocols used by IoT devices. It may be plausible to use their solution for our needs. Their specification: https://w3c.github.io/wot-binding-templates/ I mentioned an explainer which also helps although it discusses their broader architecture and not focused solely on binding templates alone. https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/blob/TAG-review/proposals/WoT%20Architecture%20Explainer.md I have reached out for success stories (or lessons learned) from their plugfests and see if we can get a subject expert to join remotely for this topic. -- Ted Guild <ted@w3.org> W3C Automotive Lead http://www.w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2019 21:50:08 UTC