- From: Bartsch, Patrick, Dr. (I/EE-511) <patrick.bartsch@audi.de>
- Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 19:58:17 +0000
- To: "ted@w3.org" <ted@w3.org>
- CC: Paul Boyes <Paul.Boyes@inrix.com>, public-automotive <public-automotive@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <A2F51470-AA26-463D-9AE2-EA6D2EB30A7B@audi.de>
On 26. Jan 2018, at 19:51, Ted Guild <ted@w3.org<mailto:ted@w3.org>> wrote: On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 13:43 -0500, Ted Guild wrote: On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 20:49 +0000, Paul Boyes wrote: Here are my thoughts: --Perhaps a phone working session on the charter might be helpful? +1 I hit send too fast. Either on the WG call or ideally before. If we can wrap up on Tuesday I can bring to W3M. We do not have to rush but this has drawn on from VIAS and chair discussions. I have some flexibility on Monday and as always scheduling is a headache. I would suggest the hour immediately preceding the Monday (PDT) Tuesday (everyone else) call but it would be painfully early CET. —With RSI subsume VISS? Will they remain separate? It is not clear from the current draft. We haven't discussed that formality and it doesn't need to be in the charter. —I agree with PatrickL’s move away from the term Infotainment to Vehicle Function. (See comments on Patrick’s pull request). Agree, I recycled wording from the previous charter and like Patrick's better. Agreed. The API and protocol can easily take it on with SOME/IP and the likes. Especially when talking about in vehicle Ethernet networks. —I suggest we revisit scope. It is ok, but could likely be cleaned up. Otherwise, it is looking good to me. Thanks, Paul Paul J. Boyes | INRIX | Director of Telematics and Standards - OpenCar | 206-276-9675 | paul.boyes@inrix.com<mailto:paul.boyes@inrix.com> | www.inrix.com<http://www.inrix.com> On Jan 22, 2018, at 10:48 AM, Ted Guild <ted@w3.org<mailto:ted@w3.org>> wrote: Here is the start of draft re-charter for Auto WG http://w3c.github.io/automotive/charter-2018.html The @@ indicate dates are pending for VISS to CR. I expect us to publish VISS before sending this charter to the AC. I welcome input and will seek review from W3C Management before sending to the AC. -- Ted Guild <ted@w3.org<mailto:ted@w3.org>> W3C Systems Team http://www.w3.org -- Ted Guild <ted@w3.org<mailto:ted@w3.org>> W3C Systems Team http://www.w3.org
Received on Saturday, 27 January 2018 19:59:16 UTC