Re: Draft Auto WG recharter

On 26. Jan 2018, at 19:51, Ted Guild <<>> wrote:

On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 13:43 -0500, Ted Guild wrote:
On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 20:49 +0000, Paul Boyes wrote:
Here are my thoughts:

--Perhaps a phone working session on the charter might be helpful?


I hit send too fast. Either on the WG call or ideally before. If we can
wrap up on Tuesday I can bring to W3M. We do not have to rush but this
has drawn on from VIAS and chair discussions. I have some flexibility
on Monday and as always scheduling is a headache. I would suggest the
hour immediately preceding the Monday (PDT) Tuesday (everyone else)
call but it would be painfully early CET.

—With RSI subsume VISS?  Will they remain separate?  It is not
from the current draft.

We haven't discussed that formality and it doesn't need to be in the

—I agree with PatrickL’s move away from the term Infotainment to
Vehicle Function. (See comments on Patrick’s pull request).

Agree, I recycled wording from the previous charter and like

Agreed. The API and protocol can easily take it on with SOME/IP and the likes. Especially when talking about in vehicle Ethernet networks.

—I suggest we revisit scope.  It is ok, but could likely be cleaned

Otherwise, it is looking good to me.



Paul J. Boyes | INRIX | Director of Telematics and Standards -
OpenCar  |  206-276-9675 |<> |<>

On Jan 22, 2018, at 10:48 AM, Ted Guild <<>> wrote:

Here is the start of draft re-charter for Auto WG

The @@ indicate dates are pending for VISS to CR. I expect us to
publish VISS before sending this charter to the AC. I welcome
will seek review from W3C Management before sending to the AC.

Ted Guild <<>>
W3C Systems Team

Ted Guild <<>>
W3C Systems Team

Received on Saturday, 27 January 2018 19:59:16 UTC