- From: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 13:43:14 -0500
- To: Paul Boyes <Paul.Boyes@inrix.com>
- Cc: public-automotive <public-automotive@w3.org>
On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 20:49 +0000, Paul Boyes wrote: > Here are my thoughts: > > --Perhaps a phone working session on the charter might be helpful? +1 > —With RSI subsume VISS? Will they remain separate? It is not clear > from the current draft. We haven't discussed that formality and it doesn't need to be in the charter. > —I agree with PatrickL’s move away from the term Infotainment to > Vehicle Function. (See comments on Patrick’s pull request). Agree, I recycled wording from the previous charter and like Patrick's better. > —I suggest we revisit scope. It is ok, but could likely be cleaned > up. > > Otherwise, it is looking good to me. > > Thanks, > > Paul > > > > Paul J. Boyes | INRIX | Director of Telematics and Standards - > OpenCar | 206-276-9675 | paul.boyes@inrix.com | www.inrix.com > > > On Jan 22, 2018, at 10:48 AM, Ted Guild <ted@w3.org> wrote: > > > > Here is the start of draft re-charter for Auto WG > > > > http://w3c.github.io/automotive/charter-2018.html > > > > The @@ indicate dates are pending for VISS to CR. I expect us to > > publish VISS before sending this charter to the AC. I welcome input > > and > > will seek review from W3C Management before sending to the AC. > > > > -- > > Ted Guild <ted@w3.org> > > W3C Systems Team > > http://www.w3.org > > > > -- Ted Guild <ted@w3.org> W3C Systems Team http://www.w3.org
Received on Friday, 26 January 2018 18:43:19 UTC