Re: Impelementation Report added (was: [Minutes] Auto WG 2018-03-20

Hi Wonsuk-san,

-       Additional update for the result of ACCESS’s implementation with
> adding missing features which got fail
> n   Urata, could you share your plan?
>
Actually, we don't have further plan to add missing functions in our VISS
 since implementation would be bit complicated.


> -       Finalizing Test Cases
> n   Urata, could you share what’s the rest of the work for test cases?
> Including required additional test cases and any other issue we need to
> solve.


Attached is document which I sent to Ted-san on 4/3.
This is basically, Test Assertion document which I fetched from
https://github.com/w3c/automotive/issues/124
 and I have added a line to indicate "Test Created" Yes/No.

The "No" and left as "Got objection" are not done due to
 lack of time and idea.

Adding more test would be good if something important is lacking.
I don't have specific idea for adding.

Kind regards,
Shinjiro Urata


2018-04-18 13:50 GMT+09:00 이원석 <wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr>:

> Urata and Peter,
>
> I have merged your commits to take a look at the draft of implementation
> report[1]. I think it’s looks good to me.
>
> If any of group members would like to see this, refer to the [1] link.
>
>
>
> Regarding this work, I would like to summarize the action items below to
> finalize test report work for VISS
>
> -       Add test results from Mitsubishi Electric’s implementation
>
> n   Peter, do you have a plan for this?
>
> -       Add test results from ETRI’s implementation
>
> n   I will show up testing demo with current test cases and ETRI’s
> implementation in Thursday meeting
>
> n   And I will add the result of this to the report
>
> -       Additional update for the result of ACCESS’s implementation with
> adding missing features which got fail
>
> n   Urata, could you share your plan?
>
> -       Finalizing Test Cases
>
> n   Urata, could you share what’s the rest of the work for test cases?
> Including required additional test cases and any other issue we need to
> solve.
>
> -       Miner revision of the report like remove status part, version
> link, etc
>
>
>
>
>
> [1] https://w3c.github.io/automotive/implementation_
> report/implementation_report.html
>
>
>
>
>
> Wonsuk
>
>
>
>
>
> *출발**: *Shinjiro Urata <shinjiro.urata@access-company.com>
> *날짜**: *2018년 4월 13일 금요일 오후 2:20
> *받는* *사람**: *T Guild <ted@w3.org>
> *참조**: *이원석 <wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr>, public-automotive <
> public-automotive@w3.org>
> *주제**: *Impelementation Report added (was: [Minutes] Auto WG 2018-03-20
>
>
>
> Hello Ted-san
>
> CC: Wonsuk-san
>
>
>
> Excuse to become very late.
>
> I have added ACCESS's implementation report as below.
>
>
>
> https://github.com/w3c/automotive/blob/implementation-report/
> implementation_report/implementation_report.html
>
>
>
> I used the format Peter-san created since it is easiest.
>
>
>
> Please have a look and let me know if there is a problems.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Shinjiro Urata
>
>
>
>
>
> 2018-04-04 10:59 GMT+09:00 Shinjiro Urata <shinjiro.urata@access-
> company.com>:
>
> Hi Wonsuk-san,
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot for the information!
>
> I'll check them.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Shinjiro Urata
>
>
>
>
>
> 2018-04-04 10:45 GMT+09:00 이원석 <wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr>:
>
> Hi. Urata.
>
> How are you doing? It looks you are so busy these days. J
>
> Thanks a lot for your effort for test cases for VISS so far.
>
>
>
> Regarding your question followings are examples for implementation report
> in W3C.
>
>
>
> Progress Events spec
>
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/Interop/ProgressEvents
>
>
>
> Selectors API Level 1 Implementation Report
>
> https://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api-testsuite/level1-baseline-
> report.html
>
>
>
> Implementation report for the Mobile Web Best Practices
>
> https://www.w3.org/2006/06/mwbp-implementation-report
>
>
>
> Wonsuk.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Shinjiro Urata <shinjiro.urata@access-company.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 03, 2018 11:38 AM
> *To:* T Guild <ted@w3.org>
> *Cc:* public-automotive <public-automotive@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Minutes] Auto WG 2018-03-20
>
>
>
> Hello Ted-san
>
>
>
> Excuse me for being so late.
>
>
>
> - VIAS place holder URL
>
> I created as below.
>
> https://github.com/aShinjiroUrata/vehicle-information-service-spec/tree/
> master/vias
>
> ##This is placeholder. I'll replace when ready.
>
>
>
> - Test case creation status
>
> Please look at the attached .xlsx file.
>
> (Added creation status in Test Assertion excel sheet.)
>
>
>
> - VISS implementationo report
>
> Could you let me know implementation report example?
>
> Then I will write one with looking at it as reference.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Shinjiro Urata
>
>
>
>
>
> 2018-03-22 7:17 GMT+09:00 Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2018/03/20-auto-minutes
>
> --
> Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
> W3C Systems Team
> http://www.w3.org
>
>
>
>
> .
>
>
>
>
>
>
> .
>

-- 
.