W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-automotive@w3.org > October 2016

RE: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server spec

From: Peter Winzell <Peter.Winzell@melcogot.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 06:13:23 +0000
To: 이원석 <wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr>
CC: public-automotive <public-automotive@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F151E948D19EFA4A8D984455EF32D51701A5E03FE8@melcosse04.meaegot.local>
Hi Wonsuk!
I think I understand. I will do a review now.

Br
/pw

From: 이원석 [mailto:wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr]
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 7:58 AM
To: Peter Winzell
Cc: public-automotive
Subject: RE: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server spec

Hi. Peter.
It doesn’t mean the consensus for the specific date. It means the consensus for official publication of vehicle signal server spec as a FPWD of W3C.

Below CfC example is from system applications WG. Typically duration of CfC is one week but we have rough consensus to go FPWD in the TPAC meeting so we might be make the term shorter. One thing you should know is W3C only publish the specs in the Tuesday or Thursday of the week. It means there is only two days to publish the FPWD of server spec in the next week.

[1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sysapps/2014Oct/0030.html


Kind regards,
Wonsuk.

From: Peter Winzell [mailto:Peter.Winzell@melcogot.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 2:37 PM
To: 이원석 <wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr>; public-automotive <public-automotive@w3.org>
Subject: RE: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server spec

Hi Wonsuk!

So, the consensus we are looking for is whether or not the Vehicle Service Spec is in a state for publication on Oct 11 ?

Br
Peter Winzell

From: 이원석 [mailto:wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr]
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 3:58 AM
To: public-automotive
Subject: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server spec

Hi. All.
In the last TPAC meeting we had a consensus to publish the FPWD for vehicle signal server spec at 11th October. Because we really want to do this before GENIVI AMM meeting in Burlingame. To achieving this, we need to have CfC(Call for Consensus) process for the spec as soon as possible.

Chairs! (Paul, Rudi and Peter)
I guess it would be perfect if you do this with short term CfC today or tomorrow!

Thanks!

Kind regards,
Wonsuk.
=========================================
이 원 석 (Wonsuk, Lee) / Senior Researcher, Ph.D
한국전자통신연구원 표준연구센터(Protocol Engineering Center, ETRI)
Mobile: +82-10-5800-3997   Office: +82-42-860-6104
E-mail: wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr<mailto:wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr>
http://www.wonsuk73.com/, twitter: @wonsuk73
=========================================

Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2016 06:13:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 24 October 2017 18:52:52 UTC