- From: Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 19:15:54 +0900
- To: public-automotive <public-automotive@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJ8iq9XUWB0Qs4jsRvA4HSGEzLx3a-K880qg-FWHagRe53a5gw@mail.gmail.com>
available at:
https://www.w3.org/2016/05/17-auto-minutes.html
also as text below.
Thanks for taking these minutes, Ted!
Kazuyuki
---
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
Automotive WG
17 May 2016
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2016/05/17-auto-irc
Attendees
Present
Paul_Boyes, Rudi_Streif, Ted_Guild, Peter_Winzel,
Kevin_Gavigan, Adam_Crofts, Kaz_Ashimura, Powell_Kinney
Regrets
Chair
Paul, Rusi, Peter
Scribe
ted
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]Iotivity OCF
2. [5]Powell's issue on the documentation format
* [6]Summary of Action Items
__________________________________________________________
<scribe> scribenick: ted
Iotivity OCF
rudi: this seems like a viable framework that might work for
our REST services
kevin: makes sense
<paul> [7]https://www.iotivity.org/
[7] https://www.iotivity.org/
<paul> [8]http://openconnectivity.org/
[8] http://openconnectivity.org/
rudi: i got into contact with a small nearby startup that has
their own nodejs approach but it not suited to our needs
<paul> [9]https://smartcar.com
[9] https://smartcar.com/
paul: we met with agl yesterday about working together with
them
... they are open to it. ted and dan tooks some actions to get
the organizations in-line
peter: i'm not sure they understood our use cases fully and
sounds
... they have ideas of their own and seemed hesitant on vss
... not sure i understand that since vss has plenty of
flexibility
rudi: vss in github is not complete, magnus is making a big
push today so it should be cleaner soon
... agl was originally a tizen approach but that was abandoned
some time ago
... they are both producing open source ivi stacks
... there are some organizational differences
ted: we'll be learning more about agl's rest/websocket
approach. hopefully we can get everyone on the same page.
they're looking at iotivity too and they are open to
modifications at this point
<inserted> kaz: WoT IG is also talking with the OCF guys about
IoTivity. so we might want to talk with the WoT guys as well
about this.
<inserted> paul: sounds good.
kaz: where should iotivity/iot discussions take place, bg or
wg?
paul: wg
kaz: we should update the charter for this new work
paul: i can take a pass at updating that charter
ted: i can ask for an extension
<kaz> [10]current charter
[10] https://www.w3.org/2014/automotive/charter
paul: sanjeev is involved in WoT and trying to get involved in
auto
... i'll follow up with WoT wg on ocf
<kaz> [ kaz: notes there was another contact from OCF for the
WoT IG, so we should talk with the WoT IG Chair, Joerg Heuer
first ]
adam: clarification, what is the genivi approach on services?
not sure we should follow agl model
paul: the use cases we are trying to support makes sense for
services approach. agl should look at what we are working on
... kevin's candidate architecture works well within genivi and
elsewhere
... there is some good alignment with genivi
rudi: i haven't seen anything until recent in agl on services
... hopefully we will see implemented in both platforms
<paul> [11]https://wiki.automotivelinux.org/eg-connectivity
[11] https://wiki.automotivelinux.org/eg-connectivity
<paul>
[12]https://wiki.automotivelinux.org/eg-connectivity/meetings
[12] https://wiki.automotivelinux.org/eg-connectivity/meetings
paul: agl's connectivity expert group is meeting on thursday
and we are welcome to attend
Powell's issue on the documentation format
<paul> [13]https://github.com/w3c/automotive/issues/85
[13] https://github.com/w3c/automotive/issues/85
... powell hasn't joined the call yet to discuss the issue he
created on github
... this aligns with how i would expect it to go
paul: rudi, have you had a chance to dig into vss further?
rudi: i look at it constantly and waiting for magnus' latest
changes, expecting those today
peter: we should look at our data spec as it is right now to
see if there is any major difference, like zones, we need to
work out
paul: it is clear that zone goes away with vss
... can you take a look peter at a section and compare the two
of them?
peter: sure especially since it is to be out soon
... i'll have an initial review within about two weeks
paul: plan on bringing it back for the next call
kaz: i'll ask kddi and access if they are available/interested
in security section/
paul: i can take a stab at the intro
kevin: i will take a look
adam: i can look at the terminology with respect to
sockets/services
paul: we need subscribe to spelled out more, grouping of
objects
adam if you want to take an initial pass that would be great
kevin: adam and i can pair on that
rudi: i will explore iotivity more to see if it is appropriate
for our needs without being overkill
paul: security is going to be critical especially as this might
be used besides ivi
... for those of you that our next call is too late in the
evening, please send updates by email or github issues
<rstreif> got to jump onto my next meeting, ttyl
<kaz> kaz: would ask Wonsuk as well about his interest
<kaz> ... btw, maybe it would be better for us to use another
title for this spec because we already use "Vehicle Information
Access API" for the existing JS API.
<kaz> paul: the wiki says "Vehicle Information Service Spec"
<kaz> all: ok
[ adjourned ]
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [14]scribe.perl version
1.128 ([15]CVS log)
$Date: 2016/05/18 10:13:18 $
[14] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[15] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2016 10:17:06 UTC