W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-automotive@w3.org > May 2016

RE: Next F2F

From: Peter Winzell <Peter.Winzell@melcogot.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 15:43:49 +0000
To: "Gavigan, Kevin" <kgavigan@jaguarlandrover.com>, Paul Boyes <pb@opencar.com>, T Guild <ted@w3.org>, Rudolf Streif <rstreif@jaguarlandrover.com>
CC: "Crofts, Adam" <acrofts1@jaguarlandrover.com>, public-automotive <public-automotive@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F151E948D19EFA4A8D984455EF32D51701A5DA2442@melcosse04.meaegot.local>
Well, it then seems like late July will win…

From: Gavigan, Kevin [mailto:kgavigan@jaguarlandrover.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 5:37 PM
To: Peter Winzell; Paul Boyes; T Guild; Rudolf Streif
Cc: Crofts, Adam; public-automotive
Subject: Re: Next F2F


Late June (or late July) is also better for Adam (Crofts) and I, as we are both on holiday in mid July

Kind regards,


Kevin Gavigan BSc, MSc, PhD, MCP, MCTS
Software Architect
Connected Infotainment
Electrical, Electronic and Software Engineering (EESE)
Jaguar Land Rover

Mobile: 07990 084866
Email: kgavigan@jaguarlandrover.com<mailto:kgavigan@jaguarlandrover.com>

Office address:
GO03/057 • Building 523, Gaydon • Maildrop: (G03)
Jaguar Land Rover • Banbury Road • Gaydon • Warwick • CV35 0RR

On 10 May 2016 at 16:23, Peter Winzell <Peter.Winzell@melcogot.com<mailto:Peter.Winzell@melcogot.com>> wrote:
Hi , late June as in last week of June should also work. The survey that was sent out did not include those dates though – so maybe that needs to be cleared with JLR since they are hosting.

Peter Winzell
From: Paul Boyes [mailto:Paul.Boyes@inrix.com<mailto:Paul.Boyes@inrix.com>]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 4:43 PM
To: ted@w3.org<mailto:ted@w3.org>
Cc: Streif, Rudolf; Crofts, Adam; public-automotive
Subject: Re: Next F2F

I think 3 days would be enough.   As for end of June, I personally am open to it.

Paul J. Boyes | INRIX | Director of Telematics and Standards - OpenCar  |  206-276-9675 | paul.boyes@inrix.com<mailto:bryan@inrix.com> | www.inrix.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.inrix.com_&d=BQMFAg&c=QbuapHRvbn0JdC8vTVkPHg&r=PRAN7lum5Ra662QLho8LU3bhFjBvLXn3bBkFbW0Amjo&m=V5l0WXfOEJwhcE0JsN06mQ5SQhpXL-DuAuK3YcnTZoc&s=OqQVi_DcS5rv8or8hZdFvY0re6YF0Wl-_8okxrxOF0w&e=>

On May 10, 2016, at 8:36 AM, Ted Guild <ted@w3.org<mailto:ted@w3.org>> wrote:

On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 08:53 -0700, Streif, Rudolf wrote:

If we are going to have the meeting in July at JLR OSTC in Portland,
we should lock down the dates rather quickly to give folks, including
OSTC staff, time for planning and preparation. OSTC has a very good
video conferencing system with large video walls. We can easily loop
in people via Google Hangouts etc. Time zones may be a problem but
other than that remote participation is certainly feasible.

Before starting a doodle, are there dates that are more conducive for
JLR OSTC?  I would like to include the possibility of the last couple
weeks of June even if our emphasis will be for a date in July.

How many days?  Typically we have done two but as we want hands on
hacking sessions, possibly of focused breakout groups on our different
deliverables, in addition to higher level meetings we may want more.

Ted Guild <ted@w3.org<mailto:ted@w3.org>>
W3C Systems Team

Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2016 15:44:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 24 October 2017 18:52:50 UTC