- From: Jey Nandakumar <jey.nandakumar@deque.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 14:52:38 +0100
- To: "Petri, Kenneth" <kenneth.petri@jpmorgan.com>
- Cc: Jennifer Chadwick <jcha@siteimprove.com>, Emma Pratt Richens <Emma.Richens@bbc.co.uk>, Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>, Gian Wild <gian@accessibilityoz.com>, Auto-WCAG List <public-auto-wcag@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAP0cZ7oMMBuPimheOcHKmmuvaqHF-k9bZv-ZVJcn=4E+SePc_Q@mail.gmail.com>
A few suggestions: 1) wcag-assert 2) wcag-verify Jey On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 2:42 PM Petri, Kenneth <kenneth.petri@jpmorgan.com> wrote: > I like WCAG-testing CG, also. > > > > *From:* Jennifer Chadwick [mailtojcha@siteimprove.com] > *Sent:* Monday, June 25, 2018 9:33 AM > *To:* Emma Pratt Richens <Emma.Richens@bbc.co.uk>; Wilco Fiers < > wilco.fiers@deque.com>; Gian Wild <gian@accessibilityoz.com> > *Cc:* Auto-WCAG List <public-auto-wcag@w3.org> > *Subject:* RE: Rebranding Auto-WCAG?? > > > > <https://maps.google.com/?q=North+America+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+110+Yonge+Street,+Suite+700++%7C+Toronto,+Ontario+M5C+1T4&entry=gmail&source=g> > > +1 to WCAG-testing CG. > > <https://maps.google.com/?q=North+America+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+110+Yonge+Street,+Suite+700++%7C+Toronto,+Ontario+M5C+1T4&entry=gmail&source=g> > > > > <https://maps.google.com/?q=North+America+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+110+Yonge+Street,+Suite+700++%7C+Toronto,+Ontario+M5C+1T4&entry=gmail&source=g> > > [image: > http://go.siteimprove.com/hubfs/Email%20Signature%20Assets%20TEST/line-sight-01.png] > > > > Jennifer Chadwick > > *Lead Accessibility Strategist, North America > <https://maps.google.com/?q=North+America+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+110+Yonge+Street,+Suite+700++%7C+Toronto,+Ontario+M5C+1T4&entry=gmail&source=g>* > > > > [image: Siteimprove logo] > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook..com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.siteimprove.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjsay%40siteimprove.com%7C0133c0d69999457b365008d514bebd53%7Cad30e5bc301d40dba10a0e8d40abe0f9%7C0%7C0%7C636437731824841757&sdata=PvlVbOpj8SHvDhdmww97qKrRfiGj9tpKFiKVEdmBXZE%3D&reserved=0> > > 110 Yonge Street, Suite 700 > <https://maps.google.com/?q=North+America+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+110+Yonge+Street,+Suite+700++%7C+Toronto,+Ontario+M5C+1T4&entry=gmail&source=g> > | > <https://maps.google.com/?q=North+America+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+110+Yonge+Street,+Suite+700++%7C+Toronto,+Ontario+M5C+1T4&entry=gmail&source=g> > Toronto, Ontario M5C 1T4 > <https://maps.google.com/?q=North+America+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+%0D%0A+110+Yonge+Street,+Suite+700++%7C+Toronto,+Ontario+M5C+1T4&entry=gmail&source=g> > *O: **(647) 952-0364 <(647)%20952-0364>** M: (905) 483-9139 > <(905)%20483-9139>* > > jcha@siteimprove.com > > > > > > > *Click here to opt out of receiving emails. > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgo.siteimprove.com%2Fcasl-unsubscribe-lp&data=02%7C01%7Cjsay%40siteimprove.com%7C0133c0d69999457b365008d514bebd53%7Cad30e5bc301d40dba10a0e8d40abe0f9%7C0%7C0%7C636437731824841757&sdata=sB9gEGzDJxpbFGBlqUFWkCNfpD3Y8pNWr8jZb%2BdNj%2FU%3D&reserved=0> > Cliquez ici pour vous désabonner/désinscrire. > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fgo.siteimprove.com%2Fcasl-unsubscribe-lp-french&data=02%7C01%7Cjsay%40siteimprove.com%7C0133c0d69999457b365008d514bebd53%7Cad30e5bc301d40dba10a0e8d40abe0f9%7C0%7C0%7C636437731824841757&sdata=o%2F8GSs6Gpjs3D1b2aYdiMAdZo0o5oLxJBys5bN5hIrU%3D&reserved=0>* > > > > *From:* Emma Pratt Richens <Emma.Richens@bbc..co.uk> > *Sent:* Monday, June 25, 2018 8:03 AM > *To:* Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>; Gian Wild < > gian@accessibilityoz.com> > *Cc:* Auto-WCAG List <public-auto-wcag@w3.org> > *Subject:* Re: Rebranding Auto-WCAG?? > > > > I like wcag-testing CG. +1 from me. > > > > -- -- -- > > *Emma J Pratt Richens*, Senior Accessibility Specialist > > BBC D&E UX&D, MediaCityUK, @EmmaJ_PR bbc.in/asg > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fbbc.in%2Fasg&data=02%7C01%7Cjcha%40siteimprove.com%7Cb3f470336143418dc36608d5da93c7ad%7Cad30e5bc301d40dba10a0e8d40abe0f9%7C0%7C0%7C636655250621839427&sdata=5FQc0RwJej1IhQCNSuvKkofMb5HVl240GAyHW9SzSzg%3D&reserved=0> > > > *"Open your eyes and then open your eyes again.”* > > > > *From: *Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com <wilco.fiers@deque..com>> > *Date: *Saturday, 23 June 2018 at 18:50 > *To: *Gian Wild <gian@accessibilityoz.com> > *Cc: *Auto-WCAG List <public-auto-wcag@w3.org> > *Subject: *Re: Rebranding Auto-WCAG?? > *Resent-From: *<public-auto-wcag@w3.org> > *Resent-Date: *Saturday, 23 June 2018 at 18:51 > > > > Hey all, > > I had the same experience as Judy. Most people I talk to about this work > is under the impression that we're focused on accessibility tooling. Even > people that know we've got a broader scope still mostly think of > standardising accessibility tools as being the primary goal for Auto-WCAG. > While that's certainly how it started, that no longer fits with the work > that's actually going on. The two changes we've made since are these: > > > > 1. Rules no longer describe test procedures. They tell "what" to test > rather than "how" to test. In that way, what Auto-WCAG is doing is > rewriting the WCAG criteria to be atomic and remove their ambiguities. Rule > writing no longer is about writing code - how something is coded up has > become irrelevant, as long as results are consistent. > > > > 2. The distinction between what is automated, semi-automated and manual no > longer exists in rules. By keeping "Auto" in our name, this group keeps > implying that the work is mostly about automation, rather than being about > harmonising test methodologies. > > > > I like Gian's suggestion of "testing", so something like a "wcag-testing > CG" or "accessibility testing CG". > > > > Wilco > > > > On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 2:27 AM Gian Wild <gian@accessibilityoz.com> > wrote: > > I like the idea of using the word “testing” instead of auto > > > > Cheers, > > Gian > > > > *From:* Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com> > *Sent:* 22 June 2018 8:43 PM > *To:* public-auto-wcag@w3.org > *Subject:* Rebranding Auto-WCAG?? > > > > Hey all, > > I wanted to get some thoughts on this. Auto-WCAG was originally conceived > with the intent to write rules for automated tools, and for semi-automated > tools. Those were two separate categories that we'd write separate rules > for. With the ACT Rules Format evolving the way it did, this distinction > has largely gone away. This begs the question of: Should we remain the > Auto-WCAG community group, or is this name no longer representative enough > of our work that we should rebrand? > > > > I'm curious to hear your thoughts. Should we rename the group, and if we > do, what should our new name be? > > > > -- > > *Wilco Fiers* > > Senior Accessibility Engineer - Co-facilitator WCAG-ACT - Chair Auto-WCAG > > > > > -- > > *Wilco Fiers* > > Senior Accessibility Engineer - Co-facilitator WCAG-ACT - Chair Auto-WCAG > > [image: cid:BCBD7D4B-677E-4B95-AE3F-60005DBD9EE4] > > This message is confidential and subject to terms at: http:// > www.jpmorgan.com/emaildisclaimer including on confidentiality, legal > privilege, viruses and monitoring of electronic messages. If you are not > the intended recipient, please delete this message and notify the sender > immediately. Any unauthorized use is strictly prohibited. >
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2018 13:53:18 UTC