- From: Wilco Fiers <w.fiers@accessibility.nl>
- Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:04:22 +0200
- To: public-auto-wcag@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAETwF3vdTCmAa2jY8LcBO5i77uNQdeOX8zTokWkOP9ZfRnChag@mail.gmail.com>
*The following is part of a column posted on the Auto-WCAG website. Feel free to share it and leave a comment!* There are many great tools on the market that can check the accessibility of web pages. The Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools List is a great resource to find checkers for different types of content. Many of them focus on testing specific aspects of accessibility, such as color contrast or parsing. But some have a broader scope and will check many different aspects and report the conformance to WCAG success criteria. I encourage all web professionals to use an accessibility checker in their daily work. But as an accessibility auditor with 8 years of experience, I must confess that I don’t use any of these checkers myself. To test HTML pages, the only tools I use are a DOM inspector, a color analyzer and a validator. So why the difference? *Read the rest at: https://www.w3.org/community/auto-wcag/2015/04/23/accessibility-checkers-in-qa/ <https://www.w3.org/community/auto-wcag/2015/04/23/accessibility-checkers-in-qa/>* Regards, Wilco Fiers Accessibility Foundation NL
Received on Thursday, 23 April 2015 10:04:57 UTC