Re: Interesting observations from QMUL

Interesting.  I wish that people complaining about WebAudio would also get
things right; it detracts from their arguments when they get things wrong.
He links the biquad filter to IIRFilter instead of BquadFilter, which does
allow changing coefficients.

He gets oscillators wrong because he wants aliased analytical oscillators.
But his other complaints are right. I think we have issues for the phase
term.  There is also a issue with allowing mathematical oscillators, I
think.

We also have an issue to implement a noise generator.  This is something
I'm interested in and would like to add that very soon.

On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 2:40 AM Matthew Paradis <matthew.paradis@bbc.co.uk>
wrote:

>
> https://intelligentsoundengineering.wordpress.com/2019/01/25/whats-up-with-the-web-audio-api/
>
>
>
> --
>
> Matthew Paradis
>
> *Senior R&D Engineer – Audio Team*,
>
> BBC Research & Development
>
>
>
> 030304 09889 | 07841 506241
>
> www.bbc.co.uk/rd/sound
>
>
>
> ----------------------------
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk
> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal
> views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
> If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
> Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in
> reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
> Further communication will signify your consent to this.
>
> ---------------------
>