Re: IDL fix status

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Joe Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com> wrote:

> Ray,
>
> A couple of questions:
>
> - Would it make sense for us to wait for the final fixes (missing dfns for
> enums, overloads, etc.) before reviewing? It's going to be hard to separate
> things that are supposed to work from things that aren't when reviewing.
>

I think it's up to you.  But as long as you avoid the 20 respec warnings, I
think it's pretty clear if I've made other mistakes.  I think I'd avoid
checking that the links work; we'll probably have to go through that after
this CL lands.  I think many of the existing <a href="#idl-foo"> stuff
needs to be replaced with plain <a>, possibly adding <dfn> as needed to
linkify correctly.

>
> - Is it OK to work on other issues, provided that we make them into PRs
> after merging your final IDL commits? Would like to keep things moving.
>

I don't think it's a problem, but I think when the contiguous idl stuff
gets merged, you'll basically need to rewrite it all, because many things
will have moved very far from where they used to be, even if the
surrounding text hasn't really changed.

>
> Best,
>
> .            .       .    .  . ...Joe
>
> Joe Berkovitz
> Founder
> Noteflight LLC
>
> 49R Day Street
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=49R+Day+Street+Somerville+MA+02144+USA&entry=gmail&source=g>
> Somerville MA 02144
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=49R+Day+Street+Somerville+MA+02144+USA&entry=gmail&source=g>
> USA
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=49R+Day+Street+Somerville+MA+02144+USA&entry=gmail&source=g>
>
> "Bring music to life"
> www.noteflight.com
>