Re: Call today?

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Joe Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com> wrote:

> Hi Ray,
>
> Apart from non-linkified types (which I think you want us to ignore) I
> didn't see anything besides whitespacey format differences when comparing
> the old and new.
>
> Any particular thing to pay special attention to?
>

Thanks for taking a look!  That was pretty much it.

I think what I'm going to do now is to merge all of my little branches into
this one. I'll occasionally add a rawgit link if anyone wants to look.

When all is converted, I'll ask for a final review where people can compare
the contiguous idl version with the old version.



>
>
> .            .       .    .  . ...Joe
>
> Joe Berkovitz
> Founder
> Noteflight LLC
>
> 49R Day Street
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=49R+Day+Street+Somerville+MA+02144+USA&entry=gmail&source=g>
> Somerville MA 02144
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=49R+Day+Street+Somerville+MA+02144+USA&entry=gmail&source=g>
> USA
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=49R+Day+Street+Somerville+MA+02144+USA&entry=gmail&source=g>
>
> "Bring music to life"
> www.noteflight.com
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Raymond Toy <rtoy@google.com> wrote:
>
>> In the meantime, can I ask for people to take a look at
>> http://rawgit.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/0b2377b/index.ht
>> ml#BaseAudioContext.
>>
>> This is the first cut at converting our spec to contiguous idl.  Don't
>> look at the actual changes to the file.  It's probably best to compare this
>> preview to the current version.
>>
>> This only updates BaseAudioContext and nothing else.  Many things won't
>> be linkified correctly because not everything is converted.
>>
>> My plan: Have everyone take a look at BaseAudioContext.  Fix up any
>> issues.  Then convert everything without reviewing each step.  When all is
>> converted, make a git tag for the old respec version that is the basis.
>> Ask for a final review with people reviewing each node to see that things
>> look right. Fix whatever people find.
>>
>> Land it. And then go back and fix up whatever mistakes we find later.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Sounds like a plan.  See you next week then.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jerry
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Joe Berkovitz [mailto:joe@noteflight.com]
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 31, 2017 8:56 AM
>>> *To:* Matthew Paradis <matthew.paradis@bbc.co.uk>
>>> *Cc:* Audio Working Group <public-audio@w3.org>
>>> *Subject:* Re: Call today?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> OK, sounds like we'll all just work on our stuff then and... shoot for
>>> next week?
>>>
>>>
>>> .            .       .    .  . ...Joe
>>>
>>> Joe Berkovitz
>>> Founder
>>> Noteflight LLC
>>>
>>> 49R Day Street
>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=49R+Day+Street+%0D+Somerville+MA+02144+%0D+USA&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>> Somerville MA 02144
>>> USA
>>>
>>> "Bring music to life"
>>> www.noteflight.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Matthew Paradis <
>>> matthew.paradis@bbc.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> Apologies all, I have been away from the office until today and the WG
>>> completely slipped my mind.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Based on the last call we said we would focus on ensuring that all open
>>> PRS were reviewed and closed off so that we could start tackling some of
>>> the issues that would result in changes across the spec.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Matthew Paradis
>>>
>>> Senior Software Engineer (Audio),
>>>
>>> BBC Research & Development
>>>
>>> 030304 09889 | 07841 506241 | matthew.paradis@bbc.co.uk |
>>> www.bbc.co.uk/rd/sound
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From: *Joe Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>
>>> *Date: *Thursday, 31 August 2017 at 16:01
>>> *To: *Audio Working Group <public-audio@w3.org>
>>> *Subject: *Call today?
>>> *Resent-From: *<public-audio@w3.org>
>>> *Resent-Date: *Thursday, 31 August 2017 at 16:02
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I've just returned from vacation and I don't see an agenda posted. I'm
>>> happy to get on the call if others want to, though. Otherwise we can work
>>> on whatever we have to do (I know I have an open issue or two) and defer to
>>> next week.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> .            .       .    .  . ...Joe
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------
>>>
>>> http://www.bbc.co.uk
>>> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain
>>> personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically
>>> stated.
>>> If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
>>> Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in
>>> reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
>>> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
>>> Further communication will signify your consent to this.
>>>
>>> ---------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>