- From: Paul Adenot <padenot@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 18:09:38 +0200
- To: Joe Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>
- Cc: Audio Working Group <public-audio@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANWt0Wo49GYt4zouWBoabv0duToSpYdXCGZroprqmbc+vdRQ2w@mail.gmail.com>
All, My work so far is at [0] (preview of the relevant section at [1]). For now, the layout of the processing algorithm is done. What I still need to do (tomorrow) is to define the three sub-algorithms, and decide whether or not to have an adaptive release. Those should not be too hard. In particular, the curve will be described loosely. Then, we'll have a compressor defined. What is needed after that is to add a section that describe how much leeway implementations can have: adaptive release, knee curve shape, etc. Feel free to comment on this work-in-progress. I feel like it should be complete and ready for proper review tomorrow. Thanks, Paul. [0]: https://github.com/padenot/web-audio-api/tree/10-dynamicscompressor [1]: https://rawgit.com/padenot/web-audio-api/10-dynamicscompressor/index.html#processing On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Paul Adenot <padenot@mozilla.com> wrote: > It's finished anyways. I'm continuing working on the compressor now. > > Paul. > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Joe Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com> wrote: > >> Thanks Paul. >> >> For the moment would you consider abandoning PeriodicWave and other ctor >> work in favor of the compressor? Matt and I feel the constructor work is >> pretty predictable and anyone could pick it up at any time -- the >> DynamicsCompressor work is inherently more complex and requires more >> thinking from the WG. >> >> Best, >> >> . . . . . ...Joe >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 15 June 2017 16:10:31 UTC