Re: Audio WG charter - responses needed!

David has just sent the email to dev-platform [0]. Usually, we wait for a
few days so that people have time to comment.

Cheers,
Paul.

[0]:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.platform/wnC8mrM46q8

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi Audio WG members,
>
> As you probably know, the Audio WG is in the process of rechartering. The
> proposed charter is at
>   https://www.w3.org/2011/audio/charter/audio-2016.html
>
> Please don't assume that rechartering is automatic. We need the support of
> 5% of the W3C Membership (or more) which currently means *19* responses
> in favor, minimum. Today we have *6*.
> So, thanks to
> * Nice Sophia Antipolis University
> * Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique
> * INSTITUT TELECOM
> * Google, Inc.
> * British Broadcasting Corporation
> * Cisco Systems
> for their support.
>
> The deadline for responses is  2016-10-31. Please encourage your Advisory
> Committee (AC) Representative to respond; the form for them to do so is at
>   https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/audio-2016/
> and takes just a minute to fill in.
>
> If you already know your organization will need more time, please let me
> know now. If you don't know who your AC Rep is, I can put you in touch.
>
> Olivier, your suggestion to send more details on current implementation
> status, uptake, and "why we took so long" is a good one; I am drafting a
> mail to be sent to the AC which will both answer those questions and serve
> as a timely reminder.
>
> --
> Chris Lilley
> @svgeesus
> Technical Director, W3C Interaction Domain
>
>