Re: Worklets spec status ?

Dumb question: why cause these to be module scripts when they're clearly
going to be loaded async from the perspective of the main script anyhow?

On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Ian Kilpatrick <ikilpatrick@google.com>
wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> I made a bunch of edits during Houdini.
> See: https://drafts.css-houdini.org/worklets/
>
> Major change is that this will require the modules infrastructure which
> was just added to the html whatwg spec.
>
> lmk if you need anything specifically.
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Ian Kilpatrick <ikilpatrick@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey Paul,
>>
>> Over the next week I've got some time to spend on it, and aiming it to
>> get to a stage where it's good for Houdini.
>>
>> What are the specific things that you need from it to move forward at the
>> moment?
>>
>> PRs are great if you have the time.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ian
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +shane
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 6:46 AM, Paul Adenot <padenot@mozilla.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ian,
>>>>
>>>> The Audio-WG (CC-ed) was wondering about the status of the Worklets
>>>> specification. There are still a few things that need to be done until we
>>>> have enough infrastructure to write the Audio Worklet text on top of it,
>>>> and the Web Audio API really need this to go forward.
>>>>
>>>> Do you have an estimate on when you'll be able to find some time to
>>>> work on it? Can we help in any way ? Since this is on the critical path for
>>>> us, it might make sense we contribute in a more direct way, by directly
>>>> sending PRs.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Paul.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Received on Sunday, 7 February 2016 12:01:21 UTC