Re: "Edit-readiness" of TPAC items

ok.

Paul.

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Wilson" <cwilso@google.com>
> To: "Joseph Berkovitz" <joe@noteflight.com>
> Cc: "Paul Adenot" <paul@paul.cx>, "Audio WG" <public-audio@w3.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:20:11 PM
> Subject: Re: "Edit-readiness" of TPAC items
> 
> sure.
> 
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Joseph Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Chris, Paul,
> >
> > There are lots and lots of editorial issues with the spec, as we’ve all
> > noted. Many of these are not difficult or contentious. To expedite
> > discussion at TPAC, I would like to propose that the two of you go over all
> > of the “Editorial/Documentation” issues flagged for TPAC 2014 and label all
> > such issues that propose a straightforward and obvious resolution with the
> > “Ready for Editing” label.
> >
> > The meaning of this label at TPAC is that Matt and I will merely ask for
> > objections to committing the proposed resolution of each such labeled
> > issue. The hope is that generally there won’t be any, and we’ll just move
> > on immediately to the next issue.
> >
> > Of course, for this to work, issues tagged this way need to contain an
> > obvious disposition preferably noted in the final comment or few. (And if
> > you disagree about the edit-readiness of an issue, that should become
> > evident at the meeting :-)
> >
> > Does this sound OK?
> >
> > .            .       .    .  . ...Joe
> >
> > *Joe Berkovitz*
> > President
> >
> > *Noteflight LLC*
> > Boston, Mass.
> > phone: +1 978 314 6271
> > www.noteflight.com
> > "Your music, everywhere"
> >
> >
>

Received on Thursday, 23 October 2014 19:42:12 UTC