Re: Milestones

That's fine with me too.  I've been marking things as "ready for editing"
if I think they're obvious enough to write up, and "ready for review" if
there's already a PR for them.

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Joseph Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>
wrote:

> Thanks!
>
> Although… Matt and I were thinking that this sort of case should be
> flagged as TPAC 2014, actually, because we were hoping to plow through and
> approve many “easy clarification” issues like this at the meeting and we
> didn’t want to assume that everyone would agree on what was easy or what
> the wording change should be.  A bunch of these small, noncontroversial
> clarifications of this type have already been tagged in this way.
>
> On the other hand, we don’t want to take up a lot of everyone’s time on
> this at the F2F.
>
> Perhaps we could address this via a speedy process at the F2F — by
> avoiding read through of trivial clarification issues at the meeting, then
> if no one offers comment on an issue, we can immediately mark it as “make
> this edit to the spec later” and move on.
>
> Thoughts welcomed on this subject.
>
> .            .       .    .  . ...Joe
>
> *Joe Berkovitz*
> President
>
> *Noteflight LLC*
> Boston, Mass.
> phone: +1 978 314 6271
> www.noteflight.com
> "Your music, everywhere"
>
> On Oct 20, 2014, at 5:28 PM, Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com> wrote:
>
> For that issue in particular, I'd just intended to express that this
> should get clarified before LC is issued.  I don't think it needs
> face-to-face discussion (i.e. I doubt it's particularly controversial).
>
> There used to be two v1 milestones, PLUS the last call milestone - I moved
> all issues filed under one of them to the other and deleted the unused one
> last week.  LC is just "I don't think we can issue a last call until this
> is resolved."  If you'd rather delineate just along V1/vNext lines and make
> LC a label, that's okay with me.
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Joseph Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Chris,
>>
>> I noticed #356 was added to the “Web Audio Last Call 1” milestone a few
>> hours back.
>>
>> To mark bugs for discussion next week Matt and I are trying to stick with
>> a single tag: “V1 (TPAC 2014)". For clarity, to include a bug in the TPAC
>> discussion, we’re asking folks to please use the TPAC 2014 tag rather than
>> a milestone designation. There appear to be two similarly named milestones
>> for v1 and we’ve never had a chance to discuss their meaning.
>>
>> (On the other hand if you didn’t want to include this particular issue in
>> the F2F discussion, then please disregard this note!)
>>
>> I hope this doesn’t seem overly fussy. (Want to compare tattoos?)
>>
>> .            .       .    .  . ...Joe
>>
>> *Joe Berkovitz*
>> President
>>
>> *Noteflight LLC*
>> Boston, Mass.
>> phone: +1 978 314 6271
>> www.noteflight.com
>> "Your music, everywhere"
>>
>>
>
>