- From: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:28:14 -0700
- To: Joseph Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>
- Cc: Audio WG <public-audio@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJK2wqXS82yUZxVsPe7v69CayVq0h=z4k15J5g_arEd9A3L+nQ@mail.gmail.com>
For that issue in particular, I'd just intended to express that this should get clarified before LC is issued. I don't think it needs face-to-face discussion (i.e. I doubt it's particularly controversial). There used to be two v1 milestones, PLUS the last call milestone - I moved all issues filed under one of them to the other and deleted the unused one last week. LC is just "I don't think we can issue a last call until this is resolved." If you'd rather delineate just along V1/vNext lines and make LC a label, that's okay with me. On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Joseph Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com> wrote: > Chris, > > I noticed #356 was added to the “Web Audio Last Call 1” milestone a few > hours back. > > To mark bugs for discussion next week Matt and I are trying to stick with > a single tag: “V1 (TPAC 2014)". For clarity, to include a bug in the TPAC > discussion, we’re asking folks to please use the TPAC 2014 tag rather than > a milestone designation. There appear to be two similarly named milestones > for v1 and we’ve never had a chance to discuss their meaning. > > (On the other hand if you didn’t want to include this particular issue in > the F2F discussion, then please disregard this note!) > > I hope this doesn’t seem overly fussy. (Want to compare tattoos?) > > . . . . . ...Joe > > *Joe Berkovitz* > President > > *Noteflight LLC* > Boston, Mass. > phone: +1 978 314 6271 > www.noteflight.com > "Your music, everywhere" > >
Received on Monday, 20 October 2014 21:28:41 UTC