I see. It should be removed in favor of fetch(). On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Olli Pettay <olli@pettay.fi> wrote: > On 09/10/2014 07:48 PM, Alex Russell wrote: > >> e) The topic of whether or not synchronous APIs must be allowed on >> workers is being debated on public-script-coord, and it seems like there is >> no >> consensus on that yet. But I find the possibility of running >> synchronous XHR on the audio processing thread unacceptable for example, >> given its >> realtime requirements. >> >> >> You should remove XHR and, if anything, only surface fetch. Actually, it >> was my recollection taht XHR isn't in the base interface for workers. Is >> that >> wrong?: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/ >> multipage/workers.html#apis-available-to-workers >> > > http://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/#interface-xmlhttprequest > I can see Exposed=Worker there. > >
Received on Wednesday, 10 September 2014 17:01:58 UTC