- From: Marcus Geelnard <mage@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 08:49:42 +0200
- To: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>, "public-audio@w3.org" <public-audio@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2014 06:50:14 UTC
Hi! First off, the interface looks good to me. The wording related to ScriptProcessorNode and AudioProcessingEvent may need to be update though (e.g. in 2.15, AudioWorkerNodes should be mentioned). Now to my question: Is now a good time to replace the AudioBuffer attributes in AudioProcessingEvent (inputBuffer, outputBuffer) with arrays of Float32Arrays? Or do we need to keep the AudioBuffer interface for some reason? /Marcus Den 2014-08-25 17:29, Chris Wilson skrev: > I've done some tweaking to the Audio Worker (issue #113 > <https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/113>) proposal, and > most significantly added the ability to create AudioParams on Audio > Workers (issue #134 > <https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/134>). > > The fork is hosted on my fork > (http://cwilso.github.io/web-audio-api/). Start here > <http://cwilso.github.io/web-audio-api/#widl-AudioContext-createAudioWorker-AudioWorkerNode-DOMString-scriptURL-unsigned-long-numberOfInputChannels-unsigned-long-numberOfOutputChannels> > to review the creation method, and the bulk of the text begins at > http://cwilso.github.io/web-audio-api/#the-audio-worker. -- Marcus Geelnard Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2014 06:50:14 UTC