- From: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 21:52:21 -0700
- To: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>, public-audio@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2014 04:52:50 UTC
Oops, meant to replay all. On Aug 25, 2014 9:51 PM, "Chris Wilson" <cwilso@google.com> wrote: > Of course you do. But the AudioWorkerNode implements the Worker interface > - you call postMessage on that. There's just not a separate subobject. > On Aug 25, 2014 9:01 PM, "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > >> Don't you want to be able to postMessage to the audio worker somehow? By >> eliminating exposure of the Worker object, you seem to prevent that. >> >> Rob >> -- >> oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo >> owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo >> osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo >> owohooo >> osoaoyoso otooo oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro,o o‘oRoaocoao,o’o >> oioso >> oaonosowoeoroaoboloeo otooo otohoeo ocooouoroto.o oAonodo oaonoyooonoeo >> owohooo >> osoaoyoso,o o‘oYooouo ofooooolo!o’o owoiololo oboeo oiono odoaonogoeoro >> ooofo >> otohoeo ofoioroeo ooofo ohoeololo. >> >
Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2014 04:52:50 UTC