Re: Audio Workers - please review

Oops, meant to replay all.
On Aug 25, 2014 9:51 PM, "Chris Wilson" <cwilso@google.com> wrote:

> Of course you do.  But the AudioWorkerNode implements the Worker interface
> - you call postMessage on that.  There's just not a separate subobject.
> On Aug 25, 2014 9:01 PM, "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:
>
>> Don't you want to be able to postMessage to the audio worker somehow? By
>> eliminating exposure of the Worker object, you seem to prevent that.
>>
>> Rob
>> --
>> oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
>> owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo
>> osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo
>> owohooo
>> osoaoyoso otooo oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro,o o‘oRoaocoao,o’o
>> oioso
>> oaonosowoeoroaoboloeo otooo otohoeo ocooouoroto.o oAonodo oaonoyooonoeo
>> owohooo
>> osoaoyoso,o o‘oYooouo ofooooolo!o’o owoiololo oboeo oiono odoaonogoeoro
>> ooofo
>> otohoeo ofoioroeo ooofo ohoeololo.
>>
>