- From: Paul Adenot <paul@paul.cx>
- Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 19:29:31 +0200
- To: public-audio@w3.org
On 02/04/2014 18:35, Raymond Toy wrote: > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Paul Adenot <paul@paul.cx> wrote: > >> Yes, we do use Blackman indeed. We should spec that. >> > > Yes. Will you write that? I have not started writing anything yet. I can, yes. > >> >> if authors have use cases that need more flexibility, it seems >> straightforward to add a API that does not break existing applications and >> provide other type of windows. >> >> If we agree on that, I'm happy to propose a patch it if nobody has started >> writing the spec text. >> > > You mean agree on adding an API to provide other window types? I'm not > opposed to that, but the demand for such seems pretty low. No, sorry for the confusion, I think we just spec Blackman. I was just saying that this does not lock the Web Audio API for ever with a single window type, because it's straightforward to add an API that does not break existing code if it's needed some day. Paul.
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2014 17:30:00 UTC