Re: Questioning the current direction of the Web Audio API

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Chris Wilson <> wrote:

> My dislike for the Media Streams Processing proposal was not its
> incorporation of JS; it was that it RELIED on JS to do even basic
> processing like gain,

That was never the case.

> and in order to do pretty much anything in it, I would have to be writing
> a lot of script myself, or including reverb.js, filter.js, oscillator.js,
> etc in most of my projects.

There was always an extension point for specifying built-in effects. That I
never got around to specifying and implementing a good set of them is
admittedly my fault.

Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *

Received on Monday, 21 October 2013 16:54:22 UTC