- From: Olivier Thereaux <Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 10:51:39 +0000
- To: Marcus Geelnard <mage@opera.com>
- CC: s p <sebpiq@gmail.com>, "<public-audio@w3.org>" <public-audio@w3.org>
On 21 Oct 2013, at 09:40, Marcus Geelnard <mage@opera.com> wrote: > I still see no harm in having a few useful nodes for casual to mid level complxity applications. OTOH there's a huge risk that the API will get bloated beyond repair if we don't focus on fixing fully programmable processing ASAP (in my world, after v1 is out). Yes. We could also consider doing this in parallel to the work on v1. We will need to dedicate a lot of effort in the necessary implement-test-improve loops but I am not getting a sense that everyone in the group is fully engaged there. Part of the group could start a task force looking at improving/fixing ScriptProcessorNode in a branch. So long as this does not derail the current work on "v1", I see no reason not to try. -- Olivier ----------------------------- http://www.bbc.co.uk This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. -----------------------------
Received on Monday, 21 October 2013 10:52:29 UTC