- From: Olivier Thereaux <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 07:28:26 -0700
- To: WebAudio/web-audio-api <web-audio-api@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 14:28:51 UTC
> Originally reported on W3C Bugzilla [ISSUE-17360](https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17360) Tue, 05 Jun 2012 11:48:54 GMT > Reported by Philip Jägenstedt > Assigned to Audio-ISSUE-73 (ConvolverNodeLimits): ConvolverNode buffer size limits [Web Audio API] http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/track/issues/73 Raised by: Philip Jägenstedt On product: Web Audio API https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/audio/raw-file/tip/webaudio/specification.html#ConvolverNode Should there be an upper limit for the length of the impulse response buffer? If a huge buffer is used this could easily completely destroy performance. If there are no practical uses for convolution over a certain size, we could just limit it and avoid different implementations having different internal limits and having to reverse engineer the competition to figure out what the Web-compatible limits are. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/117
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 14:28:51 UTC