- From: Olivier Thereaux <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 07:29:38 -0700
- To: WebAudio/web-audio-api <web-audio-api@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 14:30:06 UTC
> [Original comment](https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17396#3) by Wei James on W3C Bugzilla. Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:20:56 GMT (In reply to [comment #3](#issuecomment-24244274)) > (In reply to [comment #2](#issuecomment-24244269)) > > As Marcus pointed out in > > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012AprJun/0355.html>, > > maxNumberOfChannels doesn't seem to really work and an array of values would > > make more sense. > > Would the proposed resolution of Bug #17379 resolve this as well? > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17379#c2 the proposal in Bug #17379 seems only resolve the naming issue of channel layout. there are still two issues here: 1. using maxNumberOfChannel or using an array of layout. I think current spec using maxNumberOfChannel is reasonable. 2. Exception handling. (automatic down/up mixing or throw exception?). I prefer to automatic mixing. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/112#issuecomment-24244277
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 14:30:06 UTC