W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > July to September 2013

[Bug 22969] Clarify influence/reference to OpenAL, IPR considerations

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:27:11 +0000
To: public-audio@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-22969-5429-MWKlC3cBdO@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

--- Comment #2 from Olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk> ---
(In reply to comment #1)

> Based on the above, my conclusion would be that there is no significant
> borrowing/influence from OpenAL in the web audio API, other than
> similarities which would occur naturally since the concepts and mathematical
> basis for the two are the same. This conclusion was deemed reasonable by the
> W3C legal team.

As a next step, I would suggest:

* We remove the mention "same as OpenAL (default 1)" from section 4.15
* We review whether the two mentions of OpenAL (and other engines) in
informative text are needed and useful for the comprehension of the spec.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2013 10:27:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:03:23 UTC