W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > July to September 2013

[Bug 23037] What should happen in case of cycles containing a delay node is under-defined

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 21:22:34 +0000
To: public-audio@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-23037-5429-uT4BEF4gfx@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

--- Comment #9 from Robert O'Callahan (Mozilla) <roc@ocallahan.org> ---
Clamping to a minimum of one block is only going to happen when the DelayNode
is part of a cycle. Hopefully your use-cases for low delays don't require
DelayNodes in cycles.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 26 August 2013 21:22:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:03:23 UTC