W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > July to September 2013

[Bug 23037] What should happen in case of cycles containing a delay node is under-defined

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:00:53 +0000
To: public-audio@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-23037-5429-fkQ1AiRjJj@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23037

--- Comment #6 from paul@paul.cx <padenot@mozilla.com> ---
Yes, we are talking about clamping only for DelayNodes that are part of a
cycle.

Are we fine with having a clamping value of one block? (128 frames, 128 /
sampleRate seconds) ?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2013 17:00:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:03:23 UTC