W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > July to September 2013

[Bug 23037] What should happen in case of cycles containing a delay node is under-defined

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:42:09 +0000
To: public-audio@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-23037-5429-z91G4pjUyt@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

--- Comment #3 from Robert O'Callahan (Mozilla) <roc@ocallahan.org> ---
We actually resolved about a year ago to clamp to a minimum delay:
Making the minimum delay be one block was really the only viable option.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2013 10:42:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:03:23 UTC