- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 22:17:00 +0000
- To: public-audio@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23037 Robert O'Callahan (Mozilla) <roc@ocallahan.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |roc@ocallahan.org --- Comment #1 from Robert O'Callahan (Mozilla) <roc@ocallahan.org> --- Having to recheck for cycles every time we sample the delay AudioParams would be pretty bad I think. So I think we should clamp the DelayNode's delay to a minimum of 128 cycles at all times. Then cycle-checking just needs to ensure there's at least one DelayNode in every cycle and we're fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2013 22:17:01 UTC