Re: New proposal for fixing race conditions

On Jul 30, 2013, at 10:00 AM, Joseph Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com> wrote:

> Just to clarify (because this discussion has been so lengthy), my understanding is this performance cost (whatever its size) is associated with *fixing* the current shared-memory model to avoid the security problems resulting from visibility of shared memory that is no-longer-owned due to neutering. It is not a side-effect of anything to do with Jer's proposed new API change. Correct?

Yes.

-Jer

Received on Tuesday, 30 July 2013 17:02:29 UTC