Question on Jer's proposal

> I’ve updated the gist <https://gist.github.com/jernoble/6034137> to remove all references to “alternatives” and added a section about memory and performance considerations.

Thanks Jer.

Followon question: is every aspect of your proposal required for it to work? In particular it seems as though the audio-specific Float32Array set(AudioBufferChannel…) method is optional, given the existence of AudioBufferChannel.slice() -- you pretty much say this already in your proposal. I know some folks on the list expressed concerns about any Typed Array API changes since the WG doesn't control those specs. I don't have a feel for how extensions to some API w/r/t a type in another API are viewed in terms of ownership.

.            .       .    .  . ...Joe

Joe Berkovitz
President

Noteflight LLC
Boston, Mass.
phone: +1 978 314 6271
www.noteflight.com
"Your music, everywhere"