- From: Olivier Thereaux <Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 09:37:33 +0000
- To: "K. Gadd" <kg@luminance.org>
- CC: Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com>, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhgari@gmail.com>, Marcus Geelnard <mage@opera.com>, WG <public-audio@w3.org>
On 25 Jul 2013, at 23:37, K. Gadd <kg@luminance.org> wrote: > I feel like a broken record here continuing to repeat the fact that we have no data based upon which we can argue that performance blocks any particular design decision. The fact that new strawman use cases keep getting introduced without remedying this problem is a little bewildering to me. If the cost of building test cases to support your arguments and then gathering data is too severe, we could look at all the major Web Audio applications out there in the wild and see if the additional copies/memory usage in FF's implementation causes them to perform worse. To be fair Chris (and Jer) has also repeatedly given examples of the maths involved. See for example this, by Jer: > 1 second of 32-bit, 44kHz, stereo audio data is over 300kB. A 5 minute song will decode to over 100MB An actual demo or example would of course be valuable. Olivier ----------------------------- http://www.bbc.co.uk This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. -----------------------------
Received on Friday, 26 July 2013 09:38:21 UTC