- From: Marcus Geelnard <mage@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 21:56:17 +0200
- To: Olivier Thereaux <Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: WG <public-audio@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAL8YEv7E2wnc02sJibCaw-31a2TNWDci7FkkK94Ex-x395SAJw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Olivier, On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Olivier Thereaux < Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > Hi all, > > On 23/07/2013 17:11, "Chris Wilson" <cwilso@google.com> wrote: > > * the cost of the proposed solutions (e.g "I doubt that memcpy will do > much harm" versus "quite a heavy weight on interacting with audio buffer > data"). > > > I would like to see some more facts on the table here too. I hope that I have shown that: 1) The speed impact of memcpy is negligible. 2) For the use cases I've considered so far the additional memory impact is temporary and transient, and shouldn't prevent any use case. I think that any concrete examples showing the opposite would be valuable to this discussion. /Marcus > Olivier > > > > ----------------------------- > http://www.bbc.co.uk > This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and > may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless > specifically stated. > If you have received it in > error, please delete it from your system. > Do not use, copy or disclose the > information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender > immediately. > Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails > sent or received. > Further communication will signify your consent to > this. > ----------------------------- >
Received on Thursday, 25 July 2013 19:56:44 UTC