On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com> wrote: > 2. It needlessly complicates the API, where we now have a simple solution. > As I pointed out in the other thread, your solution requires modifying the Typed Array and structured clone specs, to add the concept of "non-neuterable ArrayBuffers", and those changes have not been proposed, let alone accepted by the editors of those specs. When you get around to proposing those changes, it's entirely possible that the editors will be unreceptive to your proposal and will ask us to solve this Web Audio-specific problem in Web Audio. So you don't really have a solution yet and it's quite uncertain whether your proposed solution will fly at the spec level. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w * *
Received on Saturday, 20 July 2013 01:06:13 UTC