On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com> wrote: > We have looked at it in quite some detail, and so far we believe we have a > safe solution. > The safety of your solution requires introducing the concept of "non-neuterable ArrayBuffers" to the Web platform. That feature needs to be added to the Typed Array and possibly Workers spec, and as far as I know that hasn't been formally proposed yet, much less accepted by the editors of those specs. So I think we should regard your solution as tentative. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w * *
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2013 23:47:20 UTC