On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Joseph Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>wrote: > >> FWIW, my reading was that Chris's last email agreed in principle that >> races needed to be eliminated and he said he wanted one more chance to go >> through the list of issues. The ball seems to be in his court. >> > > Joe, I'm sorry if you misunderstood. I *did* go through Robert's list one > more time and proposed my solution to the race problem. > That's what I thought you were trying to do. However, your solution (adding "non-neuterable ArrayBuffers" to the Web platform) only addresses the neutering issue. It does nothing to prevent ArrayBuffer modifications from JS being visible to the audio thread in a racy manner. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w * *
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 23:16:17 UTC