- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 23:10:06 +0000
- To: public-audio@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18764 --- Comment #32 from Florian Bomers <w3c_bugz@bome.com> 2012-09-10 23:10:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #31) > hard boundary at 3 bytes. (Although I think it's a good idea, but I think I've > beaten that horse enough by now.) yeah, my horse got its share, too! > Yes. I'm just starting to think the "MIDIMessage" name might be misleading, if > it's not necessarily a complete message; but then there's the oddity in > CoreMIDI that short messages are not to be split across MIDIPackets (I don't > know if that's enforced, but it is stated in the docs), so I don't think we can > just say "arbitrary buffer of any kind of data" either. I'd opt for something like "MIDIMessage: a complete MIDI message. Sys Ex messages can be sent/received partially". -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 10 September 2012 23:10:07 UTC