- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:12:08 +0000
- To: public-audio@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17398
Jussi Kalliokoski <jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 from Jussi Kalliokoski <jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com> 2012-08-21 11:12:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > Much more detail for how AudioParam values are calculated added here:
> > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/audio/rev/41db9905149d
>
> Ah, that cleared things up :) One thing that seems non-intuitive though is
> that reading the .value attribute does not produce the value that has been
> written to it. E.g. consider the following code:
>
> myParam.value = 3;
> if (myParam.value != 3) alert("I'm confused");
>
> According to the current scheme, it's entirely possible for the code to enter
> the alert-statement.
>
> Wouldn't it be better if .value always returns the value that has been written
> to it, and then we could add a new method for reading the intrinsic value (e.g.
> getIntrinsicValue())?
+1
I wonder if it would also make sense for that method to accept a time argument
so that one could anticipate the values. The only use case I can think for
knowing the intrinsic value aside from JS nodes (which has a different proposed
mechanism for that) is to visualize changes, for example knobs turning or so.
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2012 11:12:14 UTC