Re: Audio WG Teleconference, 22 August - Call for Agenda

Citerar Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>:

> I would definitely like to have a discussion on the renaming issues

+1

> I'd like us to prioritize 1) batching all the name changes together, and 2)
> getting them locked down as soon as possible.

While I sympathize with the idea of getting this done as quickly as  
possible, those are kind of orthogonal priorities: If we want to batch  
up all the API naming/interface changes into one big change, I feel a  
bit uncomfortable with rushing it. We'd need to make sure that we  
don't miss anything or get anything wrong.

Regarding naming/interface issues, from the top of my head I'd also  
like to discuss the RealtimeAnalyzerNode [1] and audio node interface  
naming [2].

/Marcus


[1] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17361
[2] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17407

Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2012 21:01:48 UTC