- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 23:31:53 +0000
- To: public-audio@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18510
Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com <mtanalin@yandex.ru> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mtanalin@yandex.ru
--- Comment #3 from Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com <mtanalin@yandex.ru> 2012-08-09 23:31:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Hi Tony, I'm just trying to get a better idea of why the contentType would be
> needed. Are there some particular audio formats which can't be correctly
> inferred through "sniffing" the audio data, which is what we're doing today.
Need for guessing when we could know exactly is always a bad idea. Intentional
abandoning of [at least optional] ability to specify type of a thing explicitly
is a bad idea squared.
Imagine a world where there are neither MIME types nor file extensions at all.
Nightmare.
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2012 23:31:54 UTC