Re: WebIDL fixes to the spec

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhgari@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm looking into start implementing Web Audio support in Gecko.  We're
>> using a Web IDL parser which allows us to catch the places where the
>> IDL definitions in the spec are not valid Web IDL.  As I'm fixing the
>> IDL files in Gecko, I'm also interested in upstreaming the fixes to
>> the spec.  What's the best way of doing this?
>>
>> Thanks!
>
>
> Hi Ehsan, glad to see you're looking into this!
>
> I'm happy to fix the spec in places where the IDL definitions are not valid
> Web IDL.  One possibility is for you to give me a diff with the corrections
> that I could apply...

Great, I'm planning to do that in
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17777.

Cheers,
--
Ehsan
<http://ehsanakhgari.org/>

Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2012 15:34:14 UTC