- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:14:17 +0000
- To: public-audio@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17415 --- Comment #62 from Olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk> 2012-07-27 11:14:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #59) > Would the following be a correct conclusion?: > > - Audio processing in JavaScript should be done in workers. […] I think that is a reasonable conclusion, yes - although there may be objections by e.g Philip who seemed to be quite adamant about it (See Comment #2). Any more suggestions on how this could be made obvious to developers (as you mentioned in Comment #4)? Would it suffice to have the default interface be constructed in the way suggested by Chris in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012JanMar/0225.html - and requiring a conscious choice *not* to use a worker? -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 27 July 2012 11:14:18 UTC