W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > July to September 2012

[Bug 17415] (JSWorkers): JavaScriptAudioNode processing in workers

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:14:17 +0000
Message-Id: <E1SuiUr-0007n7-4T@jessica.w3.org>
To: public-audio@w3.org

--- Comment #62 from Olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk> 2012-07-27 11:14:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #59)
> Would the following be a correct conclusion?:
> - Audio processing in JavaScript should be done in workers.

I think that is a reasonable conclusion, yes - although there may be objections
by e.g Philip who seemed to be quite adamant about it (See Comment #2). 

Any more suggestions on how this could be made obvious to developers (as you
mentioned in Comment #4)? Would it suffice to have the default interface be
constructed in the way suggested by Chris in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012JanMar/0225.html - and
requiring a conscious choice *not* to use a worker?

Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 27 July 2012 11:14:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:01 UTC