- From: Gabriel Cardoso <gcardoso.w@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 11:01:50 +0100
- To: Olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: public-audio@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CADSDpirJUq0N+G4UdJ+evkQPEjGYZsbu_nR5a5QdXRezcvKoHA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, A +1 for a wiki page describing the differences between the two APIs. As a (newbie) audio app developer, I have trouble diving into the MediaStream Processing specs. I also agree that having short examples implemented in each APIs would be a good solution. Just giving my opinion here about MIDI in the Music Production Tool use case, I think that being able to create MIDI tracks, upload MIDI files, editing them with a piano roll and playing them with a VST-like instrument are sufficient features. No need to access the MIDI devices in my point of view. Thanks for the summary. Bye, Gabriel 2012/2/7 Olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk> > Dear all, > > The minutes of the Audio Working Group's teleconference held on 6th > February 2012 are online: > http://www.w3.org/2012/02/06-**audio-minutes<http://www.w3.org/2012/02/06-audio-minutes> > > > The group is getting large and we may be changing our teleconference time. > Please give your preference for your typical week in the online poll: > http://www.doodle.com/**i4pecambe7a5az64<http://www.doodle.com/i4pecambe7a5az64> > > > Meeting Summary: > > * We welcomed a few new participants, including Phil Burk. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-audio/**2012JanMar/0158.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012JanMar/0158.html> > > * A follow-up on the mailing-list discussion about getUserMedia. Phil and > ROC will be participating in the TF (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/** > Public/public-media-capture/<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/>) > and act as liaison with our group. > > * One of the next steps in our work on Use Cases and Requirements is to > prioritize them. It was suggested that the group gives each UC a certain > priority level, which would then affect which requirements are needed in > the first version of our spec(s). Since the UC&R document has changed a lot > during and since the f2f meeting, the whole group is strongly encouraged to > review it. http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/**wiki/Use_Cases_and_** > Requirements<http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/wiki/Use_Cases_and_Requirements> > > * There is a need to better understand the differences between the Web > Audio API and Media Streams API - expressed both by people interested in > our work, and by many in our group. A wiki document has been started, all > (esp the two spec editors) encouraged to contribute to it, focusing > especially on how the two proposals approach our use cases differently. > http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/**wiki/Spec_Differences<http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/wiki/Spec_Differences> > > > Best, > -- > Olivier > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 10:06:37 UTC