Re: Use Cases and Requirements document

Thanks, Joe.

Do you have a rough idea when you may have a chance to work on this?
Ideally, I'd like us to be done with the scenarios in the next couple of 
weeks.

Cheers,

Olivier



On 04/01/2012 15:31, Joseph Berkovitz wrote:
> This looks great, Olivier.
>
> I will personally focus on building out UC5 (writing music on the web)
> since it is the obvious place where I can contribute concrete domain
> knowledge.
>
> ... . . . Joe
>
> *Joe Berkovitz*
> President
> Noteflight LLC
> 84 Hamilton St, Cambridge, MA 02139
> phone: +1 978 314 6271
> www.noteflight.com <http://www.noteflight.com>
>
> On Jan 4, 2012, at 10:18 AM, Olivier Thereaux wrote:
>
>> Hi group,
>>
>> Given how our important work on use cases and requirements will be in
>> the next little while, and given that we had ended up with 4
>> independent documents about this on the wiki, I took the liberty to
>> merge them all into one:
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/wiki/Use_Cases_and_Requirements
>> … and create redirects from the others.
>>
>> I have also started a skeleton for the use cases, listing 6 which we
>> may want to develop upon.
>>
>> UC 1: Video Chat
>> UC 2: HTML5 game with audio effects, music
>> UC 3: online music mixing tool
>> UC 4: Online radio broadcast
>> UC 5: writing music on the web
>> UC 6: playing a virtual music instrument
>>
>>
>> The next step will be to write the use cases (scenarios) and derive
>> requirements (desirable features and qualities). In order to help the
>> group with this work, I've started a stub of the prose for UC2 (video
>> game), following the example set by the Widgets Use Cases &
>> Requirements spec:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/wiki/Use_Cases_and_Requirements#UC_2:_HTML5_game_with_audio_effects.2C_music
>>
>> The example is imperfect and will need some work, obviously, but
>> should help get an idea of how the story (the use case) describes a
>> realistic scenario and how a number of desirable features (from our
>> API or a related API we should then identify) can be easily derived
>> from it.
>>
>>
>> Does anyone has any objection (or proposed improvement) to this way of
>> working on our UC&Rs? If not, I'd like to invite you to come forward
>> and volunteer to flesh out the use cases, or add others - either
>> completely different, or variants of the ones we have already.
>>
>> Any question?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Olivier
>>
>>
>> P.S.: if noone objects, this should close ACTION-4, ACTION-6 and ACTION-8:
>> https://www.w3.org/2011/audio/track/actions/4
>> https://www.w3.org/2011/audio/track/actions/6
>> https://www.w3.org/2011/audio/track/actions/8
>>
>>
>> --
>> Olivier Thereaux
>> BBC Internet Research & Future Services
>>
>

-- 
Olivier Thereaux
BBC Internet Research & Future Services