Saturday, 31 March 2012
Friday, 30 March 2012
- Schedule: Next Telecon 2nd April
- Re: Specificity in the Web Audio API spec
- Re: Specificity in the Web Audio API spec
- Re: Specificity in the Web Audio API spec
- Re: Specificity in the Web Audio API spec
- Re: Specificity in the Web Audio API spec
- Re: Reviewing the Web Audio API (from webrtc)
- RE: Specificity in the Web Audio API spec
Thursday, 29 March 2012
- Re: MSP stalled streams, Was: Reviewing the Web Audio API (from webrtc)
- Re: MSP stalled streams, Was: Reviewing the Web Audio API (from webrtc)
- Re: Web Audio API Feedback from Spaceport.io
- Re: setValueFunctionAtTime for AudioParam
- Re: setValueFunctionAtTime for AudioParam
- Re: Web audio api - ambisonics
- Re: Specificity in the Web Audio API spec
- Re: MSP stalled streams, Was: Reviewing the Web Audio API (from webrtc)
- Re: MSP stalled streams, Was: Reviewing the Web Audio API (from webrtc)
- Specificity in the Web Audio API spec
- MSP stalled streams, Was: Reviewing the Web Audio API (from webrtc)
- Re: Reviewing the Web Audio API (from webrtc)
Wednesday, 28 March 2012
Thursday, 29 March 2012
- Re: setValueFunctionAtTime for AudioParam
- Re: Reviewing the Web Audio API (from webrtc)
- Re: Reviewing the Web Audio API (from webrtc)
- Re: Reviewing the Web Audio API (from webrtc)
- Re: Reviewing the Web Audio API (from webrtc)
- Reviewing the Web Audio API (from webrtc)
- Re: setValueFunctionAtTime for AudioParam
Wednesday, 28 March 2012
Tuesday, 27 March 2012
- Re: Web Audio API Feedback from Spaceport.io
- Re: Web Audio API Feedback from Spaceport.io
- Web Audio API Feedback from Spaceport.io
- Re: setValueFunctionAtTime for AudioParam
- Audio-ISSUE-10 (negative-gain): Negative values suggested for the Audio Gain Node [Web Audio API]
- Re: setValueFunctionAtTime for AudioParam
- Re: setValueFunctionAtTime for AudioParam
- Re: "Bouncing" an audioContext
- Re: setValueFunctionAtTime for AudioParam
- Re: "Bouncing" an audioContext
- "Bouncing" an audioContext
- Re: Audio-ISSUE-4 (quinnirill): Setting sample rates for individual JavaScriptProcessingNodes [Web Audio API]
Monday, 26 March 2012
- Telecon Minutes from Today
- Re: Audio-ISSUE-4 (quinnirill): Setting sample rates for individual JavaScriptProcessingNodes [Web Audio API]
- Re: setValueFunctionAtTime for AudioParam
- Re: setValueFunctionAtTime for AudioParam
- Audio-ISSUE-9 (multi-channel-support): Multi-Channel support in Use Cases & Reqs. [Use Cases and Requirements]
- Re: setValueFunctionAtTime for AudioParam
- Re: Schedule: Next Telecon - Mon 26th March
- Re: Schedule: Next Telecon - Mon 26th March
- Re: specific demos wanted, question about media streams processing api
- Re: specific demos wanted, question about media streams processing api
- RE: about multiple channel support in the Use case and Requirement
- Re: ISSUE-5: pausing a subgraph
- Re: ISSUE-5: pausing a subgraph
- Re: specific demos wanted, question about media streams processing api
Wednesday, 21 March 2012
Friday, 23 March 2012
- Re: fftSize requirement for RealtimeAnalyserNode
- RE: fftSize requirement for RealtimeAnalyserNode
- Re: Suggestion for the Audio Gain Node
- Re: fftSize requirement for RealtimeAnalyserNode
- Schedule: Next Telecon - Mon 26th March
- Suggestion for the Audio Gain Node
- specific demos wanted, question about media streams processing api
- Re: Audio-ISSUE-8 (output-rt-analyser): about numberOfOutputs of RealtimeAnalyserNode [Web Audio API]
- Re: Tracking comments and issues (Was: Web Audio API is now ready for publication)
- RE: about multiple channel support in the Use case and Requirement
- Re: ISSUE-5: pausing a subgraph
- about multiple channel support in the Use case and Requirement
- RE: Tracking comments and issues (Was: Web Audio API is now ready for publication)
- Audio-ISSUE-8 (output-rt-analyser): about numberOfOutputs of RealtimeAnalyserNode [Web Audio API]
Thursday, 22 March 2012
- Re: fftSize requirement for RealtimeAnalyserNode
- Re: fftSize requirement for RealtimeAnalyserNode
- Re: ISSUE-5: pausing a subgraph
- Re: Advice on the convolver node
- Re: Advice on the convolver node
- Re: Advice on the convolver node
- Re: fftSize requirement for RealtimeAnalyserNode
- Re: fftSize requirement for RealtimeAnalyserNode
- Re: fftSize requirement for RealtimeAnalyserNode
- Re: fftSize requirement for RealtimeAnalyserNode
- Re: fftSize requirement for RealtimeAnalyserNode
- Audio-ISSUE-7: Power of Two FFTs for RealtimeAnalyserNode [Web Audio API]
- Re: about numberOfOutputs of RealtimeAnalyserNode
- Re: fftSize requirement for RealtimeAnalyserNode
- Use Cases and Requirements table, rev.4
- Re: Advice on the convolver node
- Re: Tracking comments and issues (Was: Web Audio API is now ready for publication)
- fftSize requirement for RealtimeAnalyserNode
- RE: Tracking comments and issues (Was: Web Audio API is now ready for publication)
- RE: how can I get the diff of spec between two versions?
- Re: how can I get the diff of spec between two versions?
- Re: how can I get the diff of spec between two versions?
- Re: how can I get the diff of spec between two versions?
- Tracking comments and issues (Was: Web Audio API is now ready for publication)
- Re: ISSUE-5: pausing a subgraph
- some feedback for the new WD of Web Audio API
- RE: about numberOfOutputs of RealtimeAnalyserNode
- about numberOfOutputs of RealtimeAnalyserNode
- how can I get the diff of spec between two versions?
Wednesday, 21 March 2012
- Re: Web Audio API is now ready for publication
- Re: Web Audio API is now ready for publication
- Re: replay AudioBufferSourceNode ?
- Re: replay AudioBufferSourceNode ?
- Re: Audio-ISSUE-6 (audioparam): AudioParam constructor [Web Audio API]
- Audio-ISSUE-6 (audioparam): AudioParam constructor [Web Audio API]
- RE: replay AudioBufferSourceNode ?
- Re: replay AudioBufferSourceNode ?
Tuesday, 20 March 2012
- Re: W3C TPAC2012 - Will your group meet in Lyon, France WBS
- Re: bump: AudioParam constructor
- Re: W3C TPAC2012 - Will your group meet in Lyon, France WBS
- Re: bump: AudioParam constructor
- Re: replay AudioBufferSourceNode ?
- Re: W3C TPAC2012 - Will your group meet in Lyon, France WBS
- Re: Web Audio working draft comments and questions
- Re: a few question: gimbal lock, page visibility, outterconeangle
- Re: W3C TPAC2012 - Will your group meet in Lyon, France WBS
- Re: Advice on the convolver node
- Re: W3C TPAC2012 - Will your group meet in Lyon, France WBS
- Re: Advice on the convolver node
- Advice on the convolver node
- ISSUE-5: pausing a subgraph
- Audio-ISSUE-5 (pause-subgraph): Pausing a subgraph [Web Audio API]
- Re: Any word on having web audio resample a sound stream?
- Minutes of Audio WG teleconference, 2012-03-19
- [POLL] Next face-to-face meeting at TPAC, alternate/additional f2f meeting?
Monday, 19 March 2012
Tuesday, 20 March 2012
- Re: W3C TPAC2012 - Will your group meet in Lyon, France WBS
- replay AudioBufferSourceNode ?
- Re: Call for Review: Web Audio API
Monday, 19 March 2012
- Re: Some questions about JavaScriptNode
- Re: bump: AudioParam constructor
- Re: bump: AudioParam constructor
- Re: Some questions about JavaScriptNode
- Re: Web Audio working draft comments and questions
- Re: W3C TPAC2012 - Will your group meet in Lyon, France WBS
- bump: AudioParam constructor
- Call for Review: Web Audio API
- Fwd: W3C TPAC2012 - Will your group meet in Lyon, France WBS
- Re: Web Workers
- Re: Web Workers
- Re: Schedule: Next Telecon - Mon March 19th
- Re: Schedule: Next Telecon - Mon March 19th
- Re: Proposed UC - metronome and instrument tuner
- Some questions about JavaScriptNode
- Re: Generators
- Fwd: Web Workers
- Re: Schedule: Next Telecon - Mon March 19th
- Re: Schedule: Next Telecon - Mon March 19th
Thursday, 15 March 2012
Monday, 19 March 2012
Saturday, 17 March 2012
- Re: DynamicsCompressorNode implementation.
- Re: DynamicsCompressorNode implementation.
- DynamicsCompressorNode implementation.
- Any word on having web audio resample a sound stream?
Friday, 16 March 2012
- Schedule: Next Telecon - Mon March 19th
- Re: Web Workers
- Re: imùpossible to update in the wiki
- Re: experience sharing
Thursday, 15 March 2012
- Re: imùpossible to update in the wiki
- imùpossible to update in the wiki
- Re: a few question: gimbal lock, page visibility, outterconeangle
- Web Audio API spec published as second public WD
- Re: Web Workers
- Re: Web Workers
- Re: a few question: gimbal lock, page visibility, outterconeangle
- Re: Web Workers
Wednesday, 14 March 2012
- Re: Should we add a set Channel number API for Web Audio spec?
- Re: Use-case for audio/video track mixing with ducking effect
- Should we add a set Channel number API for Web Audio spec?
- Re: Web Audio API is now ready for publication
Tuesday, 13 March 2012
- Re: Generators
- Re: Generators
- Re: Generators
- Re: Web Audio API is now ready for publication
- Re: a few question: gimbal lock, page visibility, outterconeangle
- Re: Fwd: Web Audio API is now ready for publication
- Fwd: Web Audio API is now ready for publication
- Re: Generators
- Generators
- Re: How can I contribute?
- a few question: gimbal lock, page visibility, outterconeangle
- Re: Web Workers
- experience sharing
- Re: How can I contribute?
- Re: How can I contribute?
- Re: How can I contribute?
- Re: How can I contribute?
- Re: How can I contribute?
- [Minutes] Audio WG teleconference, 2012-03-12
Monday, 12 March 2012
- Re: Regrets: [Agenda] Audio WG teleconference, 2012-03-12
- Regrets: [Agenda] Audio WG teleconference, 2012-03-12
- Re: Proposed UC - metronome and instrument tuner
- How can I contribute?
- Re: Proposed UC - metronome and instrument tuner
- Re: Use-case for audio/video track mixing with ducking effect
- Re: Proposed UC - metronome and instrument tuner
- Regrets: [Agenda] Audio WG teleconference, 2012-03-12
- Re: Proposed UC - metronome and instrument tuner
- Re: Proposed UC - metronome and instrument tuner
- Re: Proposed UC - metronome and instrument tuner
Sunday, 11 March 2012
Saturday, 10 March 2012
Friday, 9 March 2012
Wednesday, 7 March 2012
Monday, 5 March 2012
- Re: MIDI files and streams
- Audio-ISSUE-4 (quinnirill): Setting sample rates for individual JavaScriptProcessingNodes [Web Audio API]
- Audio-ISSUE-3 (quinnirill): A way to destroy an AudioContext instance [Web Audio API]
- Re: MIDI files and streams
- Re: MIDI files and streams
- Please document issues (Re: Feedback from Official.fm Labs)
- Re: MIDI files and streams
- Re: MIDI files and streams
- Re: MIDI files and streams
Saturday, 3 March 2012
- Re: MIDI files and streams
- Re: MIDI files and streams
- Re: Feedback from Official.fm Labs
- Re: Feedback from Official.fm Labs
Friday, 2 March 2012
- Re: MIDI files and streams -- was ACTION-33: MIDI charter proposal
- Re: MIDI files and streams -- was ACTION-33: MIDI charter proposal
- Re: WebAudio Implementation feedback
- Re: MIDI files and streams
- Re: MIDI files and streams
- [Agenda] Audio WG teleconference, 2012-03-05
- Do we need a "testing the APIs" wiki document?
- Re: Use-case for audio/video track mixing with ducking effect
- Re: Use-case for audio/video track mixing with ducking effect
- MIDI files and streams -- was ACTION-33: MIDI charter proposal
Thursday, 1 March 2012
- Re: Web Workers
- Re: Web Workers
- Re: ACTION-33: MIDI charter proposal
- Re: ACTION-33: MIDI charter proposal
- Re: ACTION-33: MIDI charter proposal
- Re: ACTION-33: MIDI charter proposal
- Re: ACTION-33: MIDI charter proposal
- Re: WebAudio Implementation feedback
Wednesday, 29 February 2012
- Use-case for audio/video track mixing with ducking effect
- Re: Web Workers
- Re: Web Workers
- Re: ACTION-33: MIDI charter proposal
- Re: Feedback from Official.fm Labs
- Re: Feedback from Official.fm Labs
- Re: ACTION-33: MIDI charter proposal
- RE: ACTION-33: MIDI charter proposal
- Minutes of W3C Audio WG Teleconference, 27th Feb 2012
- Fwd: Daylight Saving Time change –first half of 2012
Tuesday, 28 February 2012
- WebAudio Implementation feedback
- RE: ACTION-33: MIDI charter proposal
- Re: Feedback from Official.fm Labs
- Re: Feedback from Official.fm Labs
- Technitone
- Feedback from Official.fm Labs
- Potential addition to "UC 2: HTML5 game with audio effects, music" regarding playback interruptions.
- Re: Next pub of Web Audio API doc (Was: Minutes of Audio WG meeting, 20 Feb 2012)
- Next pub of Web Audio API doc (Was: Minutes of Audio WG meeting, 20 Feb 2012)
Monday, 27 February 2012
Friday, 24 February 2012
- Re: [Agenda] Audio WG teleconference, 2012-02-27
- [Agenda] Audio WG teleconference, 2012-02-27
- Re: Web Audio API feedback for UC3
- Web Audio API feedback for UC3
Thursday, 23 February 2012
Wednesday, 22 February 2012
Tuesday, 21 February 2012
- Re: Online sequencer demo (Was: Joining the group)
- Re: Web Workers
- Web Workers
- Re: Joining the group
- Re: Online sequencer demo (Was: Joining the group)
- Re: Joining the group
- Re: Online sequencer demo (Was: Joining the group)
- Re: Online sequencer demo (Was: Joining the group)
- Re: Joining the group
- Online sequencer demo (Was: Joining the group)
- Re: Joining the group
Monday, 20 February 2012
- Re: Joining the group
- Use Cases and Requirements table, rev.3
- Re: wavetable synthesis in games
- Action 28 - clearing up the "temporary heap"
Friday, 17 February 2012
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements priorities: UC 6 and "Playback Rate"
- [agenda] W3C audio WG teleconference, 20 Feb 2012 - NOTE NEW TIME
- Re: Changes to "HTML5 game" use case
- Re: Changes to "HTML5 game" use case
- Re: Proposed UC - metronome and instrument tuner
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements priorities: UC 6 and "Playback Rate"
- RE: Use Cases and Requirements priorities: UC 6 and "Playback Rate"
- Use Cases and Requirements priorities: UC 6 and "Playback Rate"
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements priorities
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements priorities
- RE: audio delay node max delay time
Thursday, 16 February 2012
- RE: audio delay node max delay time
- Re: audio delay node max delay time
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements priorities
- Re: audio delay node max delay time
- RE: audio delay node max delay time
- Use Cases and Requirements priorities
- Re: audio delay node max delay time
- Re: audio delay node max delay time
- Re: audio delay node max delay time
Wednesday, 15 February 2012
- audio delay node max delay time
- Re: Audio processing with web workers
- Minutes of Audio WG meeting, 13 Feb 2012
- Re: Web Audio API channel handling
Tuesday, 14 February 2012
Monday, 13 February 2012
- Re: [Agenda] Audio WG teleconference, 2012-02-13
- Re: [Agenda] Audio WG teleconference, 2012-02-13
- Re: [Agenda] Audio WG teleconference, 2012-02-13
- Re: [Agenda] Audio WG teleconference, 2012-02-13
- Re: Standardizing audio "level 1" features first?
- RE: Standardizing audio "level 1" features first?
- RE: [Agenda] Audio WG teleconference, 2012-02-13
- Re: HOMEWORK: Review Use-Cases & Requirements Doc for Mon
- RE: [Agenda] Audio WG teleconference, 2012-02-13
Saturday, 11 February 2012
Friday, 10 February 2012
Saturday, 11 February 2012
- Re: HOMEWORK: Review Use-Cases & Requirements Doc for Mon
- Re: [Agenda] Audio WG teleconference, 2012-02-13
- RE: [Agenda] Audio WG teleconference, 2012-02-13
- Fwd: CfC to publish FPWD of "MediaStream Capture Scenarios", deadline 20 Feb
Friday, 10 February 2012
- Audio processing with web workers
- [Agenda] Audio WG teleconference, 2012-02-13
- Re: Chords in the MIDI API?
- Creating ISSUES to track discussion/resolution on technical questions
- Audio-ISSUE-2 (hardware): Mobile / Limited hardware considerations [Use Cases and Requirements]
- Re: Chords in the MIDI API?
- Re: Standardizing audio "level 1" features first?
- Re: Standardizing audio "level 1" features first?
- Re: Standardizing audio "level 1" features first?
- Re: Standardizing audio "level 1" features first?
- RE: Standardizing audio "level 1" features first?
- Re: Standardizing audio "level 1" features first?
- Re: Standardizing audio "level 1" features first?
Thursday, 9 February 2012
Friday, 10 February 2012
Thursday, 9 February 2012
- HOMEWORK: Review Use-Cases & Requirements Doc for Mon
- Chords in the MIDI API?
- REMINDER: Please respond to group poll for the ongoing telecon time
- Re: oscillators and the Web Audio API
- Re: Joining the group
- Re: oscillators and the Web Audio API
- Re: oscillators and the Web Audio API
Wednesday, 8 February 2012
- Re: oscillators and the Web Audio API
- Joining the group
- Re: oscillators and the Web Audio API
- Re: oscillators and the Web Audio API
- Re: oscillators and the Web Audio API
- Re: oscillators and the Web Audio API
- Re: oscillators and the Web Audio API
- Re: oscillators and the Web Audio API
- Re: oscillators and the Web Audio API
- Re: oscillators and the Web Audio API
- Re: oscillators and the Web Audio API
- Re: oscillators and the Web Audio API
- Re: Minutes of Audio WG meeting, 2012-02-06
- Re: oscillators and the Web Audio API
- Re: oscillators and the Web Audio API
- Re: Changes to "HTML5 game" use case
- Re: Changes to "HTML5 game" use case
- Re: Changes to "HTML5 game" use case
- Re: Changes to "HTML5 game" use case
- Re: oscillators and the Web Audio API
- Re: oscillators and the Web Audio API
- Re: oscillators and the Web Audio API
- Re: oscillators and the Web Audio API
- Re: linear ramps and the Web Audio API
- Re: oscillators and the Web Audio API
- PortAudio, was "ProcessedMediaStream demos"
- Re: ProcessedMediaStream demos
Tuesday, 7 February 2012
- Re: ProcessedMediaStream demos
- Re: ProcessedMediaStream demos
- Re: Minutes of Audio WG meeting, 2012-02-06
- Re: linear ramps and the Web Audio API
- Re: oscillators and the Web Audio API
- Re: ProcessedMediaStream demos
- Re: ProcessedMediaStream demos
- Re: Minutes of Audio WG meeting, 2012-02-06
- linear ramps and the Web Audio API
- Re: oscillators and the Web Audio API
- Re: ProcessedMediaStream demos
- Re: Minutes of Audio WG meeting, 2012-02-06
- Minutes of Audio WG meeting, 2012-02-06
- Re: oscillators and the Web Audio API
- linear ramps and the Web Audio API
- oscillators and the Web Audio API
Monday, 6 February 2012
- Re: Differences Between Specs
- Re: Differences Between Specs
- introduction Phil Burk
- Differences Between Specs
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Changes to "HTML5 game" use case
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: latest version of the "Web Audio API" draft ?
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: latest version of the "Web Audio API" draft ?
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: latest version of the "Web Audio API" draft ?
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: latest version of the "Web Audio API" draft ?
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: latest version of the "Web Audio API" draft ?
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- MPC2000
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Mapping Use Cases / Requirements (Was: Updates to the Use Cases and Requirements doc)
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Next Telecon - Mon 6th Feb - 9PM GMT
- Comments on the Web Audio API
Sunday, 5 February 2012
Thursday, 2 February 2012
Saturday, 4 February 2012
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
Friday, 3 February 2012
- RE: Potential IP issues with OpenAL or FMOD?
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Telcon Time (was: Next Telecon - Mon 6th Feb - 9PM GMT)
- RE: Potential IP issues with OpenAL or FMOD?
- Re: latest version of the "Web Audio API" draft ?
- Next Telecon - Mon 6th Feb - 9PM GMT
- RE: Potential IP issues with OpenAL or FMOD?
- Re: Potential IP issues with OpenAL or FMOD?
- Updates to the Use Cases and Requirements doc
- Audio-ISSUE-1: test
- Potential IP issues with OpenAL or FMOD?
- latest version of the "Web Audio API" draft ?
Thursday, 2 February 2012
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- RE: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- RE: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- RE: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- RE: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- RE: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- RE: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
Wednesday, 1 February 2012
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- RE: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- RE: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases)
- Re: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases)
- RE: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases)
- Re: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- RE: Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- RE: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases)
- Re: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases)
- Re: Newbie questions about web audio working group specs
- Re: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases)
- Re: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases)
- Re: Newbie questions about web audio working group specs
- Adding MIDI APIs to Audio WG Charter (was: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases))
- MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases)
- Re: getUserMedia use cases
- Re: Newbie questions about web audio working group specs
- Re: getUserMedia use cases
- Re: getUserMedia use cases
- Re: getUserMedia use cases
- RE: getUserMedia use cases
Tuesday, 31 January 2012
- Re: Newbie questions about web audio working group specs
- Re: getUserMedia use cases
- Re: getUserMedia use cases
- Re: getUserMedia use cases
- Re: getUserMedia use cases
- Re: Newbie questions about web audio working group specs
Monday, 30 January 2012
Tuesday, 31 January 2012
Monday, 30 January 2012
- Re: getUserMedia use cases
- Re: getUserMedia use cases
- Re: getUserMedia use cases
- Re: getUserMedia use cases
- getUserMedia use cases
- No teleconference today, 30 Jan 2012
Friday, 27 January 2012
Wednesday, 25 January 2012
Tuesday, 24 January 2012
Friday, 20 January 2012
Thursday, 19 January 2012
- Re: New UC 6 (virtual instruments) and revised UC 5 (music editor) posted to the wiki
- Re: ProcessedMediaStream demos
- Re: ProcessedMediaStream demos
- New UC 6 (virtual instruments) and revised UC 5 (music editor) posted to the wiki
Wednesday, 18 January 2012
- Re: UC 7 - Audio / Music Visualization
- Re: ProcessedMediaStream demos
- Re: UC 7 - Audio / Music Visualization
- Re: UC 7 - Audio / Music Visualization
- Re: UC 7 - Audio / Music Visualization
Tuesday, 17 January 2012
- Re: UC 7 - Audio / Music Visualization
- Re: UC 7 - Audio / Music Visualization
- Re: ProcessedMediaStream demos
- Minutes of Audio WG teleconference, 2012-01-16
- Re: speech speed up/down (Was: Building UC1 (Video Chat) from the WebRTC use case)
- Re: speech speed up/down (Was: Building UC1 (Video Chat) from the WebRTC use case)
- ProcessedMediaStream demos
Monday, 16 January 2012
- Re: UC 7 - Audio / Music Visualization
- Re: UC 7 - Audio / Music Visualization
- Re: speech speed up/down (Was: Building UC1 (Video Chat) from the WebRTC use case)
- UC 7 - Audio / Music Visualization
- Re: (Was: Building UC1 (Video Chat) from the WebRTC use case)
- (Was: Building UC1 (Video Chat) from the WebRTC use case)
Sunday, 15 January 2012
Friday, 13 January 2012
- Re: Audio WG Teleconference 16th January 2012
- Audio WG Teleconference 16th January 2012
- Re: Building UC1 (Video Chat) from the WebRTC use case
- Re: Building UC1 (Video Chat) from the WebRTC use case
- Use case for syncing / realigning / speed change ? (Was: Building UC1 (Video Chat) from the WebRTC use case)
- Re: Building UC1 (Video Chat) from the WebRTC use case
- Re: Building UC1 (Video Chat) from the WebRTC use case
Thursday, 12 January 2012
- Re: Building UC1 (Video Chat) from the WebRTC use case
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements document
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements document
- Re: Building UC1 (Video Chat) from the WebRTC use case
- Building UC1 (Video Chat) from the WebRTC use case
Wednesday, 11 January 2012
Tuesday, 10 January 2012
Monday, 9 January 2012
- Latency
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements document
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements document
- Re: Use Cases and Requirements document