- From: Olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:11:08 +0100
- To: Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com>
- CC: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>, public-audio@w3.org
Received on Friday, 29 June 2012 07:11:42 UTC
Hi Chris, On 28/06/2012 19:26, Chris Rogers wrote: > This is one method in a family of methods which include "AtTime" in > their name: > > setValueAtTime() > linearRampToValueAtTime() > exponentialRampToValueAtTime() > setTargetValueAtTime() > setValueCurveAtTime() > > So I think it's important to maintain consistency here. Yes, good point - we should either keep those as they are or change them all. I note that the methods all use the "atTime" naming convention, rather than simply be called setValue, setTargetValue, etc because the latter set of names is used for the events. Is that correct? Olivier
Received on Friday, 29 June 2012 07:11:42 UTC